Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> Mon, 21 September 2020 02:35 UTC
Return-Path: <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902DA3A11DD; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:35:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vQgAGFEqIBv0; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D9703A0C47; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx4.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 123436A257; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:35:35 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1600655735; bh=SqrNH0lQgZhWv3l4ldJAyRaQ+HoHvPYuudr/VwiJ+vU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=PwALRQUpb/SFGHldZk+QIJ/6CTChdUf7CeQZlONzIf1IEUMxCsPkxAIAhGEQjQq+p Zm7NU3mEagJeMIUFIx4Pgooz6cCy+z2VjgzjQqPTBX//694DuTeQJ2JOqnRttAMpSi oFZCRk/ZroRSv1MB/6WEXyGu+uLVvmXYN5lZbrBpVjN1fpz03bbsSFWT9WWFAQyGri DCfbVwED44RgeaABIL4sjiJ6RnSmzxwTxEyS8yv4UsAoxyqet5QWK/h+nPMVksZCK9 WthCNUaN1b18OGBejyQCyY3UZegpMK2K6UI4pnxT7PdJDaGW47LooDzaQL0VhlPuOm eC9x23L/90qmQ==
Received: from appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com (appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com [10.20.28.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DCE9F3C0358; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 04:35:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 20:35:34 -0600
From: Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview.all@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Message-ID: <149164507.10800.1600655734767@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJK8yz1mOjR1FQ7iTBM2SaTjWOg3Vh==TZTrRBQNL9Zq7g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <160020314948.26909.8626308879432538042@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJK8yz1mOjR1FQ7iTBM2SaTjWOg3Vh==TZTrRBQNL9Zq7g@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_10799_452166257.1600655734754"
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.4-Rev8
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/TooqQPLWGisy2AiW5GNGNi6TFG8>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 02:35:42 -0000
How about changing the first paragraph of Section 3.2 to the following: "The server returns a variable-length string that is the generated preview for that message. This string is intended to be viewed by the user as a contextual preview of the entire message, and is not intended to be interpreted in any way by the client software." Slightly altered Barry's wording - "user" is already defined in Section 2 as the human user, so to be consistent I think we should use "user" instead of "end-user". michael > On 09/15/2020 3:26 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > > > Meral, thanks for the review. The document does say in the first sentence of the Introduction that the preview is for the end user. I agree that it would be useful to emphasize that, though, and I think the right place to do it is by adding to the first paragraph of Section 3.2 something like the following: “The preview string is meant to help the end-user, and is not intended to be interpreted in any way by the client software.” > > Barry > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:52 PM Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org mailto:noreply@ietf.org > wrote: > > > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > > > > Review result: Ready with Nits > > > > > > > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > > > > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > > > > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just > > > > like any other last call comments. > > > > > > > > For more information, please see the FAQ at > > > > > > > > <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. > > > > > > > > Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09 > > > > Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour > > > > Review Date: 2020-09-15 > > > > IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14 > > > > IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat > > > > > > > > Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I have > > > > some comments. > > > > > > > > Major issues: > > > > > > > > Minor issues: > > > > > > > > Nits/editorial comments: In Section 4.2, it would have been good to give some > > > > example and advice on when the client uses the preview to take some action. Is > > > > this to be avoided? (Was not very clear to me). > > > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Meral Shirazipour > > > > http://www.ericsson.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-ext… Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker
- Re: [Extra] Genart last call review of draft-ietf… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: Genart last call review of … Michael Slusarz
- Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: Genart last call review of … Barry Leiba
- Re: [Extra] [Gen-art] [EXT] Re: Genart last call … Alissa Cooper