Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDF13A07BF for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=cFTlRdeB; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=btToUMvh
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URfs-lAY5KLK for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B6693A07BE for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:53:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515025C0095 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:53:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:53:37 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=jCYcVBZ 8DvBUUpVOGu+98EudZLv6t04eF77U2edSCxI=; b=cFTlRdeBZYso8pt2O9NOBmX U7SXpy5rq/OXQEhAvH50thpxyhNgAhy4XTQVTZ4H9QkfzQrY8fFF33sfJsI6xEHv EJR163GdE4jxZbdbM507WV9zHpYYmPM3wRiXU0fDSLxy6IRpSSNNBB39ydTwsIVy +ULlzlVyllB98rFSXod4n/M31e8ELGsAZn7GDOczVUZBAs33GWfIjulOuvobb5Cv otdP/c7Fgy4eTt5BzlMDa84Qepf2iAEdmC1zTKRd5aTG7kLemJwBepnynvYMNwQQ P0IIHdcpvvrhBTVyhzsLowIsK2oQCSonkMkdERwtcvCRBPcxZ1SnFwNpMopP2mA= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=jCYcVB Z8DvBUUpVOGu+98EudZLv6t04eF77U2edSCxI=; b=btToUMvhGhwNlraBHx6QJX tIVCHGu5WNZ2q/uRjq46bhKkjxeBz8tCewjlRhMkJheHQfPsKA/gUPmUNIi9o2vN a0k7+qoAZ3YtcuDRNYLeREnrbwPHtvhb5x2q/rQmthJux8Nr7awWzinzUs+rpDIG KTJy4vME0qAUp9FWMEviDFGn7pDvzWwQRr+rPvwEm/7OQbd+LEUK5zRYj/mCpATl T70rm/MlAx6/B//5loN8XPmsbF419wj+nbriCVag/445HxXxdTuvrtn1aSsKKMNl ji/g18to1mOSnMmqEftjGTkk2VXD8WH3b15IjHMOfQZRTzcsiz7C8VWLdReCDXPA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:0dfgXh4S0y8sH-DR8ZPe5wIrj1ODGzzi6v5RVMfWFznIVhbB5uRNeA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehiedgheelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtd erreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhnucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghes fhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvudeuieehgf dvheeuueejjeeuudfgiefgveetfeelteeffffgtdejjefgueduvdenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrg hilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:0dfgXu7Gw_6NK_vC_JwvU_O2CqWl6CHzl4tCkwL72Xn9xKCNPF5UEw> <xmx:0dfgXoff3RzJxAigA0oeeaMqhutNhxPJGi5zkQJZFN786y2i25KXZA> <xmx:0dfgXqLiogiN1UdpEBykA8ld21Gv30RPEoDEXJaDFid9zdKWAUaFsQ> <xmx:0dfgXobV71GNQxBRGxkgAVnDU8IOZoCt2wNDvtGEheXwohqj5y36Fg>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 05AEB180091; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:53:37 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-525-ge8fa799-fm-20200609.001-ge8fa7990
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <f4090e79-3157-4c8a-bf79-6cfaf0bfccb3@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <345bfd7c-f16e-c9b2-1697-da66929086d0@isode.com>
References: <9d20f8a5-9441-47ba-b2f3-c2ee87f97a81@dogfood.fastmail.com> <345bfd7c-f16e-c9b2-1697-da66929086d0@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 22:53:15 +1000
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=2a940c5cb3e6400bbf229a4a0d88a20c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/WxhP7ru579mjaxSZuoQHp81KIPE>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:53:39 -0000

On Wed, Jun 10, 2020, at 22:50, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Bron,

> On 06/06/2020 07:41, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> Hi Extra-ordinary people,
>> 
>> We have an interim meeting scheduled in a couple of weeks, where we'll be mostly talking about IMAP4rev2 I'm sure. We need to decide BEFORE then whether we will also be meeting at the IETF108 virtual meeting in not-Madrid.
>> 
>> Does anybody have a strong opinion on this? I'm inclined not to take up a time slot unless people thing there's valuable work which is better done during the official IETF108 times. I'll be attending anyway because I plan to run a JMAP session, but I feel that EXTRA has less need to meet during a virtual IETF.
>> 
>> Let me know, pretty much if anyone thinks it's going to be worth having the session I'll ask for it - they're always a pleasant way to spend some time.
> I think it will really depend on what actions items we come up after the EXTRA session next week and AD review of IMAP4rev2.

> Maybe ask for a shared slot between JMAP and EXTRA?

> Best Regards,

> Alexey


I currently have a 50 min slot for JMAP - I could extend that to ask for a 140 min slot instead for both!

Bron.

--
 Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
 brong@fastmailteam.com