Re: [Extra] [secdir] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-extra-quota-06

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi Shawn,

Thank you for your review.

On 07/09/2021 03:32, Shawn Emery via Datatracker wrote:
> Reviewer: Shawn Emery
> Review result: Has Nits
>
> I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors.
> Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
> last call comments.
>
> This draft specifies an extension to the IMAP protocol that allows querying and
> administrative functions related to resource limits and utilization.
>
> The security considerations section does exist and describes that the extension
> must adhere to the local security policies.   It continues to state that user's resource
> usage could also be considered sensitive information.  I don't believe that this draft
> adds additional security concerns from the proposed to be obsoleted RFC, 2087.
> These updates define two additional resource types (ANNOTATION-STORAGE and
> MAILBOX), a response code, and two data items.
>
> General comments:
>
> None.
>
> Editorial comments:
>
> s/a couple of extension/an extension/
> s/mupltiple/multiple/
> s/   Name of the quota resource type:\n/   Name of the quota resource type: ANNOTATION-STORAGE\n/
> s/registrations for 3/registrations for 4/
> s/clarify meaning/clarify the meaning/

I've fixed the editorial comments that you provided.

Best Regards,

Alexey