Re: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-05.txt

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Sun, 14 July 2019 13:12 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB361201F8 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.557
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.557 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.091, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xC9xRS8wcXWz for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com [209.85.166.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DE71201EC for <extra@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id j6so29989175ioa.5 for <extra@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=vkM7GWqxMum84gz5RK7O7MpFxIdmkLluhfzsizT8jrw=; b=M5JpDy4ztpG4Pqf8T8IRE+MRvZ/EQY4m6DwhmwsNoAo1wsushhMlWkvULG/R5iNyDl ip9HaQAX8feBCT6GfPrZrRUVxoUtiTHDFjOWVGNOhaVRfMFN3fJG6vCSzpfbX/zfraZs cj13WBTBXTOsORrR6IMd6pBrdiWMG1iF7vj0Xj6fZVa5JJRaiVnTPcAwgYWzcDp4mfWI Syto0jXS2RL7R30juXZcLJzxw7UPnBpb8ZeXOgp1oX+DQrj6mc7PudFcnUOynGGvWwHG zg9W494taa3rmEYiUFZZzRD/8QBmGUiAQEzNMDVQzeWMEgmi8Xmh5tUP5AMpoBr47OiW I7Gg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWa4KZcHZMht0s7JAIzBmTJvrLshmm0YZOwLXzjd1smhDYDdj/i P8RG+xa7uoslE9Tg51Hh88UKvcecOIfdStdAo98=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxe0GfpTjDYQBIV2iNb6wTSuAh01px4KxmLJwms3FrjcVu9c2K1NifLV4DcUo/z28l47PJC0DQBLfqeZHwLoq0=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:9701:: with SMTP id w1mr20633083ioj.294.1563109952728; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 06:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156268893231.15786.8849995440978646095@ietfa.amsl.com> <33b03176-fd2d-474a-abb8-043f1d45451d@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <33b03176-fd2d-474a-abb8-043f1d45451d@www.fastmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 09:12:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJ8G3yojqib3UbMMt6aMR=unsa93P=4FPik8pX9VSZZzA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Cc: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007a34ad058da3e52e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/Z1BAmbWJCzexkWjyLVOFwcg-abo>
Subject: Re: [Extra] I-D Action: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-05.txt
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 13:12:35 -0000

This is a really dicey situation, because it’s impossible to know what the
user wants, depending upon the situation.  One can easily come up with
reasonable scenarios where the subscription is strictly to a mailbox’s
name, and it should not follow a rename.

I think the best we can do is talk about the options and use cases, and
leave it without normative statements.

Barry

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 8:40 AM Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
wrote:

> Late comment on this - based on a query that came up in info-cyrus.
> RFC3501 was not clear on the handling of subscription when renaming
> folders, or when a client uses the DELETE command itself via IMAP.  It does
> say that the server must not unilaterally remove the subscription if the
> folder no longer exists (e.g. an alerts mailbox when gets deleted when
> empty and recreated when new email arrives), but nothing else.
>
> It would be good to clarify expected behaviour in those two cases, and at
> least say the server MAY delete the subscription if the user deletes a
> folder, and maybe even SHOULD rename the subscription if the user renames
> the folder!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bron.
>
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2019, at 02:15, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise
> or Amend WG of the IETF.
>
>         Title           : INTERNET MESSAGE ACCESS PROTOCOL - VERSION 4rev2
>         Authors         : Alexey Melnikov
>                           Barry Leiba
> Filename        : draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-05.txt
> Pages           : 145
> Date            : 2019-07-09
>
> Abstract:
>    The Internet Message Access Protocol, Version 4rev2 (IMAP4rev2)
>    allows a client to access and manipulate electronic mail messages on
>    a server.  IMAP4rev2 permits manipulation of mailboxes (remote
>    message folders) in a way that is functionally equivalent to local
>    folders.  IMAP4rev2 also provides the capability for an offline
>    client to resynchronize with the server.
>
>    IMAP4rev2 includes operations for creating, deleting, and renaming
>    mailboxes, checking for new messages, permanently removing messages,
>    setting and clearing flags, RFC 5322, RFC 2045 and RFC 2231 parsing,
>    searching, and selective fetching of message attributes, texts, and
>    portions thereof.  Messages in IMAP4rev2 are accessed by the use of
>    numbers.  These numbers are either message sequence numbers or unique
>    identifiers.
>
>    IMAP4rev2 does not specify a means of posting mail; this function is
>    handled by a mail submission protocol such as RFC 6409.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2/
>
> There are also htmlized versions available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-05
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-05
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-05
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Extra mailing list
> Extra@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra
>
>
> --
>   Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
>   brong@fastmailteam.com
>
>
>