Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Tue, 02 February 2021 17:26 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B4C3A0C8F; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:26:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ix1PyCPaGKHH; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:26:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460753A0C9C; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:26:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1612286804; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=HwQlhMqVfbu5fswdDWZkri0x00aiFekFKnhzgrb6gaY=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=ZGIyMkNdsn+0CLwgtO2iLzz6kd4eDJensuu9mjiig4g4x+/TDMnTnqquhNGBue7UH2tOo3 Czk2TGjWYEaPrme4nJJe+e0YJ/rfQ3qZEWWZWqMGjcgLPg7hspfn8N+czrPmVF/HgFNJOq xa6LZGWAJoWMigPQ6cbFaD1xzh7AAvc=;
Received: from [192.168.1.222] (host5-81-100-50.range5-81.btcentralplus.com [5.81.100.50]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YBmLUwAuQZlC@waldorf.isode.com>; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:26:43 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com, draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org
References: <161227892696.22043.1613107216198518224@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <5e926862-06e5-dfcf-0d73-83c44607f486@isode.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 17:26:43 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0
In-Reply-To: <161227892696.22043.1613107216198518224@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/_niV5zDGqWIA3ef9bASL3Fl1E3g>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 17:26:47 -0000

Hi Roman,

Replying to one more comment:

On 02/02/2021 15:15, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> ** Section 7.1.  Other than a clear text connection, under what circumstances
> would PRIVACYREQUIRED be returned?
That is it.
> I ask because the statement “The operation
> is not permitted due to a lack of privacy” seems rather generic and might
> benefit from tighter scoping of what “lack of privacy” means.

I changed "privacy" to "data confidentiality". Do you think this is 
clear enough now?

Best Regards,

Alexey