Re: [Extra] Review: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-11

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 09 July 2020 11:03 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229E43A08AA for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 04:03:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=Um1j60jz; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=GhYrpKZn
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XXo084KHV9Yy for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A29A33A08AB for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 04:03:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3766A5C00CD; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:03:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap38 ([10.202.2.88]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 Jul 2020 07:03:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to :references:date:from:to:subject:content-type; s=fm3; bh=jHP/NWM Z34+9uigtr5Cz1X4hirDr8l7fz21tazF7RGs=; b=Um1j60jzmKiuR4iwvkAGvuJ To27sOushBuceFDXYJZM6WfkhkQXGRuBwm3WTYxVlVZvrcWxh41GJCe7y9XSXXrH scBLjjL1xuUr3+GHu7VjSJ9TVXkHRLBdpP7RqwuShAeTS66o24CgSf1aBVsf47lW dgSB9zq7RzIJstkzLzUANX4o+3cqs4aR3mPh0lZB4kG/Or44JZI+8Azkhh6XQDy7 7MAVdBprOmZyxtCF92FbLuoRd4G/nyTaWbz0HsM/ejYsZzLb0jVj/PCppKT67toK 9GIuKJ/ahWHb/a9HS6K7GEyHVlJHtixs9jKMgZhABEUp+KNh7ISGZ7SN0VkCvog= =
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=jHP/NW MZ34+9uigtr5Cz1X4hirDr8l7fz21tazF7RGs=; b=GhYrpKZnpdA8EkuQr0gJ9G HMgCCpW+ZTiMo/yCbu9kMHHnTI709wQAwJ9Srgh1Z/QxCTPWmwSk+QyFQX+UsEis ElaVQKIyzpYYgq53P7U8gzJl/TUbn2LgSzk5hIXsDalTvW7eKCVhQrRzACd3kkhy HgtnwnH91rh544hphD587TUHB1kZ51QwhD+FohIYmm8M0D4Quna4tdM1XC2xF1Bg 9aHruaNpz1Az65yIqSk/eW/nkAq6nj8xGl0C4QiNzhhsUxvx/Zv2b8NRqNcFehBQ ymkbrBhhaaP9FPnAPOUdxtcxEVZQDHH31Nf4CSVmeCzJiYDq6OlqHGLu+9eBA9DA ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:h_kGX0jMdd7JR85IVDBLbmjRWx13Io0QhR4p2tNa2h1z8nK59WHmSg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrudelgdefiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefofgggkfgjfhffhffvufgtsegrtderreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfuehrohhn ucfiohhnugifrghnrgdfuceosghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlthgvrghmrdgtohhmqe enucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvudeuieehgfdvheeuueejjeeuudfgiefgveetfeelteef fffgtdejjefgueduvdenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpegsrhhonhhgsehfrghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:h_kGX9DGBph7ADTpnBv_PhX3wPY1qqQPaEgXVxtfP0620qatN87TVQ> <xmx:h_kGX8HeoXANWJ5H3gv72a-Rbbxyza1yJpr7j3naxU83Z_iP7vIdDA> <xmx:h_kGX1Sq3F_7PqU_Tgey-wfr5ZVlmWJbWH97E7joMIrCjuBTuiYb-A> <xmx:iPkGXw94yKHiQyzHU5pXRC7HFvORHOAyP92DMPt6ghrhhXXmMboqig>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 7AD4C4AA005D; Thu, 9 Jul 2020 07:03:35 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-637-g57f734b-fm-idx2020-20200709.002-g57f734bf
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <4429b64a-d767-4483-9d03-98e87dce89bd@dogfood.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <bff6bdb1-2a36-ec54-602a-41f7206b34dc@isode.com>
References: <9fdfa8e8-147d-4248-a0c1-48de171ac675@dogfood.fastmail.com> <cf5e3b1d-29fd-2b58-a2a8-6ade6d7ac307@isode.com> <345e934f-e540-4b42-bd5e-8c1e1f6965f8@www.fastmail.com> <3da1a65d-4825-426a-8b6d-70f0e923310e@dogfood.fastmail.com> <bff6bdb1-2a36-ec54-602a-41f7206b34dc@isode.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 21:03:14 +1000
From: "Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: "Alexey Melnikov" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=a43bfb5214f545cfbe5ea3114419a98c
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/aIn54Lj7TTghyd1va0MzVtwkMfo>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Review: draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-11
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2020 11:03:40 -0000

On Thu, Jul 9, 2020, at 20:33, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Hi Bron,

> On 08/07/2020 13:58, Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> I have reviewed all the changes from -12 to -15 and am still mostly happy :) I haven't reviewed -15 in full because it's a big job!
>> 
>> Regarding the changes in -13, I have a couple of small things:
>> 
>> *Regarding unsolicited fetch:***
>> 
>> If the server chooses to send unsolicited FETCH responses, they MUST include UID FETCH item. Note that this is a new requirement when compared to RFC 3501.
>> 
>> This could do with a clarification that this only applies after "ENABLED IMAP4REV2".
> Actually, in this one case: I don't think so. It shouldn't break any old (IMAP4rev1 only) clients to return this.


I don't even remember which client it bothered, but I remember one of them didn't like it.

Maybe it just didn't like it if you added UID to explicit FETCH when you didn't ask for it, not sure.

> But this made me think: Maybe the document needs a new section that list everything that the server should do after ENABLED IMAP4rev2?

>> *Regarding SELECT allowing non-canonical names:***
>> 
>> We've already discussed the list response to CREATE. Should SELECT also return the canonical representation of the mailbox name as part of the reply?
> This will be again returning an untagged LIST response on SELECT.

> I will add it to my to do list.


Yeah, that makes sense.

Cheers,

Bron.

--
 Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
 brong@fastmailteam.com