Re: [Extra] imap4rev2: RFC6851 MOVE

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Thu, 15 November 2018 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0349212D4EF for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:52:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hg9R5GXfBJr3 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E012612D4E7 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 05:52:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ED3C001B; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:53:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1542290011; bh=rKmlie0CGzp0YS5dTL01UdRMpKeBJuxoBR6FoZxKAGE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:From; b=cNniKuzLZm+oI+IO0OULBroSNwWuYL60i6u4+b8sXWz+0ho/Qhzv7syFkLN9kYiRj aNV3O1W5VRVXgSxJdAUxY7h+RUaVHpnsaGjjcf77rfW4RmD6C9Uvvr39hByEYI77fG 0v3cng766RGITPIK8YS8xtJTg7AJwiK9pqCeALtc=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1542290010-32427-32424/10/6033; Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:53:30 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: extra@ietf.org, Stuart Brandt <stujenerin=40aol.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 14:52:26 +0100
Message-Id: <+zYCDTO4ZdsjSWin88IbqbIxTnobzOcvIPeIiYbAjBA=.sha-256@antelope.email>
References: <bf58fc05-b4f6-4078-a888-ddda75cce724@sloti7d1t02> <5BE4DB10.6090003@aol.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/cUuK4oNBqLtA7d4kuEzBLpIYMIA>
Subject: Re: [Extra] imap4rev2: RFC6851 MOVE
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 13:52:33 -0000

Move had 10-15 implementations soon after being published as RFC, and 
judging by my inbox, people did not have problems implementing it. And: 
it was regularly requested before that time.

So... what are the 
criteria for inclusion, and how can something like move not pass the 
test?

Arnt