[Extra] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-06: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 16 December 2020 10:17 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, Jiankang Yao <yaojk@cnnic.cn>, yaojk@cnnic.cn
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <160811385245.9819.13497049798009432966@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 02:17:32 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/hGdOWY_0lHEopqnYU4KikCc2hYk>
Subject: [Extra] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-06: (with COMMENT)

Robert Wilton has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-sieve-mailboxid/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi,

Thanks for this document.  It was easy to read/understand.

One minor suggestion.  It would perhaps be better to use "SHOULD" rather than
"It is advisable" in section 4.2.

One nit: "end run" rather than "endrun"?

Regards,
Rob

[Extra] Robert Wilton's No Objection on draft-iet… Robert Wilton via Datatracker