IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Thu, 04 February 2021 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB563A1685; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:02:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.12
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.12 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cooperw.in header.b=pa9aAQyi; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=C/FZOGum
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EWHLkLo2w1M; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4775D3A166C; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 09:02:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6C1D0F; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:02:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:02:25 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm2; bh=Q 4YyOFG+ky0jBnl+PXhzIxr6tfconoIJ0tC1hXjwzrg=; b=pa9aAQyie11AZRrRC V9jw2vUxE36Hg/2DKpq/ror67xK1ePHSS5O6F43MgboONzT5UisiAISK67vB1p74 skYg1TqHKaiONQ3hZW93rH8sbc9rytrbUxaAoMznHXNpIanpcWvIYyI14GrjFWcC 40wPbvI3Yzk1ms6GsZwu2ayqOxEKYPXC7MvZa1PmwGYoYy5Txdw5q+AfMpO7nfZL 2M/l4iKqDWST/krtR6dy+mC1GEuK8fytVsnjMv0fBJDH1BkZCFaVHix07X55UL4Z +un4CzXacBxd45kxCJ8MQLbP0ebt5c20MCqdad8Ml1ZVMVudoJN2vkxxAi3i3lzY 6jKDQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=Q4YyOFG+ky0jBnl+PXhzIxr6tfconoIJ0tC1hXjwz rg=; b=C/FZOGumtfMxUC6L4owlVrJyAowCydHBr+ScIaM6jj9LaC2eE/WK/csJh YIz/a4J7Zk5HhLpczKeizvMJylpNIGehw8uWWAqqRjr+yWV5CjU/suKRxRucubng 22N/MbvfR+S6BSAt5D8rC2HyCsK5E0hMh1pw7xCANgZuvaysgJeNGW39tHSZDVGz 58EXGY5qV+7aiZOFRQBnGHyyO54371oGmU8W39hHft7gp34lVUQUgfSDyq/K8MyK 7xjSRhII8Z1SNXfwG2F+cauTaWnsip6OgYR4U2DZ/g+XKr/IoTvfmNnpMxQvXdDg yfxb43oVSFjbbWT2/J7uxheX+qXrA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:oCgcYKRxs2CvG-kOIB6z-4bwx1RrBoosCJaUKpKJfxVkLYbFIAnQ4w> <xme:oCgcYFdJyRRQpPeqqW6FpCebzWyMFeajIM7D_87E7CBs6NSWSe9MfcmQz9sIVFb8q Vdork3WD96fJ0_C2g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrgeeggdekkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtdejnecuhfhrohhmpeetlhhishhs rgcuvehoohhpvghruceorghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinheqnecuggftrfgrth htvghrnhephfeiueffjeevteeijeehhfdtgfejieefgfeggefhfeejvdehleevvdfgfeff lefgnecukfhppedujeefrdefkedruddujedrjedunecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprghlihhsshgrsegtohhophgvrhifrdhinh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oCgcYJB2JQWxElBUWPm_SAX_J0R-_LuH473b_8xvsigDFHRzPoi6VQ> <xmx:oCgcYD0VuU2Y4-efxX2dOSI4qRCTqUvTyrnqbKRlDP6f6zS4GVeTDA> <xmx:oCgcYJQe-p0U8esvnpqZXljGF5FEllHHMxoSAETfardnwN_VwvtpRg> <xmx:oCgcYAP4VLJekoqaHBKWxluuq1QMunZxwZxF1NQmMGV-4R3rWs2K0g>
Received: from rtp-alcoop-nitro2.cisco.com (unknown [173.38.117.71]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E94BB108005B; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 12:02:23 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJLNnD0gJyjsMjQODC_vKLFQPJMf_oBnfp_hS2nrSD+2Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:02:23 -0500
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <470EB1D6-0D84-4DC2-A483-56F9B9C76DA3@cooperw.in>
References: <161228843386.9750.10522178607825201429@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJJqMMR4er0Qz+pccOEKe0+F+ABiBSijifOyc3dK7ZqvhA@mail.gmail.com> <9D024588-53BA-47AD-9AFD-46E2E9C350BD@cooperw.in> <CALaySJLNnD0gJyjsMjQODC_vKLFQPJMf_oBnfp_hS2nrSD+2Tg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/i1UcHAlakiVVEVZoS9ypzMU2kT8>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 17:02:28 -0000


> On Feb 4, 2021, at 10:32 AM, Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
> 
>>> That said, there are two things:
>>> 
>>> 1. As Alexey has pointed out with other comments, changing these often
>>> involves carefully checking literal lengths, RFC822-SIZE values, and
>>> other such, and has a high potential to introduce errors.
>>> 
>>> 2. I have some thought toward keeping Mark's voice in here, and that
>>> mostly shows up in the examples.  Part of me would rather not scrub it
>>> out.
>> 
>> The point of raising it in the first place was about perpetuating the biases of the earlier documents/authors.
>> The base RFCs will remain in the archive for people to read.
> 
> Yes, true, and that takes care of point 2.  You're right.
> 
> Do you think it's worth the risk of introducing errors (point 1)?

I’m not sure I understand it well enough. If you substitute values that are the same length in characters as the old values, is this still a problem? I.e., if you padded examples with numbers ("example123456”) or something along those lines, does that help?

Thanks,
Alissa

> 
> Barry

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email