[Extra] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate-01: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 25 September 2018 05:03 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, extra-chairs@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com, extra@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153785181249.31287.13479743016328520407.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 22:03:32 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/qKsai4Z_4McxCqSN2tXBeG84nuw>
Subject: [Extra] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate-01: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate-01: Yes

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

This seems a very useful mechanism. Thanks to everyone who contributed.

§2:

>  The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
>  "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
>  document are to be interpreted as described in [KEYWORDS].

Please update to use RFC 8174's boilerplate.

[Extra] Adam Roach's Yes on draft-ietf-extra-imap… Adam Roach