Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)

Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org> Tue, 02 February 2021 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <rdd@cert.org>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0537D3A1045; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:51:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eZlbbTZmYLPO; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from veto.sei.cmu.edu (veto.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0097A3A1044; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from korb.sei.cmu.edu (korb.sei.cmu.edu [10.64.21.30]) by veto.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 112Ip5j6005542; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:51:05 -0500
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 veto.sei.cmu.edu 112Ip5j6005542
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cert.org; s=yc2bmwvrj62m; t=1612291865; bh=xv95EwIXT99oCVzogUi8An3dMtkx1eNNIAK5J/BaIc8=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=gL8tAkGlDb5FpXFfrT5bt53rJHXv9BFwyYslNDnGHILYimIlFWvyzzZRpCCNlqWPe 2DuMXibF7FjSV48K1DyQAoDiGZxbywXcfHdiWDuyDBMizPJQiETMBHkLW79x82p8ap rJ0shKVzoHW/C/JRsPSiZgZQwV850sWILcyMnyxI=
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (morris.ad.sei.cmu.edu [147.72.252.46]) by korb.sei.cmu.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 112IouuH027922; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:50:56 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu (147.72.252.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2106.2; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:50:56 -0500
Received: from MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb]) by MORRIS.ad.sei.cmu.edu ([fe80::555b:9498:552e:d1bb%13]) with mapi id 15.01.2106.002; Tue, 2 Feb 2021 13:50:56 -0500
From: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "extra@ietf.org" <extra@ietf.org>, "brong@fastmailteam.com" <brong@fastmailteam.com>, "draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2@ietf.org>, "extra-chairs@ietf.org" <extra-chairs@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHW+YiWO7cNWLrnI02qa9YhuqUDh6pFNX4A
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 18:50:54 +0000
Message-ID: <fae85b0ad594409cb7726d73a6c85af4@cert.org>
References: <161227892696.22043.1613107216198518224@ietfa.amsl.com> <5e926862-06e5-dfcf-0d73-83c44607f486@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <5e926862-06e5-dfcf-0d73-83c44607f486@isode.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.64.202.236]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/rsNIa3_UgUcDT04LdBJgtKdbp20>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2021 18:51:11 -0000

Hi Alexey!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2021 12:27 PM
> To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>rg>; The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: extra@ietf.org; brong@fastmailteam.com; draft-ietf-extra-
> imap4rev2@ietf.org; extra-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-
> imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
> 
> Hi Roman,
> 
> Replying to one more comment:
> 
> On 02/02/2021 15:15, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> > ** Section 7.1.  Other than a clear text connection, under what
> > circumstances would PRIVACYREQUIRED be returned?
> That is it.
> > I ask because the statement “The operation is not permitted due to a
> > lack of privacy” seems rather generic and might benefit from tighter
> > scoping of what “lack of privacy” means.
> 
> I changed "privacy" to "data confidentiality". Do you think this is clear enough
> now?

Indeed.  Thanks for making the change.

Roman