Re: [Extra] SNIPPET (now PREVIEW) draft update

"Bron Gondwana" <brong@fastmailteam.com> Thu, 08 November 2018 14:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E21126CB6 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:42:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.982
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.982 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HEADER_CTYPE_ONLY=0.717, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=K+aF5st7; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=LM5Uu28b
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hGqlIKjcu5JO for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:42:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 565C512872C for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 06:42:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7624A22164 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:42:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:42:35 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from :to:subject:content-type; s=fm1; bh=V1oQvFn4yqs2cLytwziyhB8j28dh MvtePLxKnU16TFg=; b=K+aF5st79d0Pd+ehxguXkepZGeY7ojP0j2r8Ir73pyfk yCv5H/uYdfJeM71H1yN+RBg2mVWoZwJWLz6/9/9kaDgqE0afmX4bovZm8H5ivWWc YFYZkqJq6aKi7qtiVRW00hGySrtSUAOffUz9axhgbHlJV9Q1UPrKdTguCbI2ax8H uSjZ5qnS8rCF+ccLeq8D0pPjTiypqMn2gbkAhsNwXd/MoPiDvehNnU2CV7TEbHy3 4QzrI+9AvaQ61OV7h/3tnxW5ZzGKBxWfpYl83Du96+3kjYRQ7cS19+oFQefIvUGY 1mZ6sRWjU3sXSFiPR3tp1So6phMHvQBpGxVF3/F1yQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=V1oQvFn4yqs2cLytw ziyhB8j28dhMvtePLxKnU16TFg=; b=LM5Uu28bxHq8oYGQPvj2jwGsOZxyJFI6x yUtOinCemoTyFp7gi6YEap8km1wtCi7LpzQ+hsLESJKZJbeOdkYsMoF49X5yZmqj Zfbto3a1H2Zq5CE4xANfouMJBbQOpO61MRKD/DU8VKydrn6XBXYoU4xssOnuChi3 fFu0DAEKb2qWo3s+BJjG3FlBiXlOPfNmihO2fUFdxMJ/XUXnlxwhT+7BRepkTkj9 REWisXByc8HVmfs+qafcn/sH5lmuqi7OQrllyJ8LqCf9Urf/xdguTr4vvZjUDgcS O6WoL+iszdxXH6A4XyONNmbgeKAjtKNgb4uyIYcBIgTlFU3lEg5pQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:W0vkWx2NKEo17qQIndl5lpu9NI6zcTf3W9utk1m5B-9gmE8q0HPd1w>
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:W0vkW6rtSMEccIjuzcp2DrY6iwhEIlukl-06kzHaAc-Bfa07ahk2Yw> <xmx:W0vkW0ZXznD7ZHN7uoWP2wHU2UcI7AcSRBW_3f0cNcACAlYNFuB11w> <xmx:W0vkW3yM-pKSR63vJ9rz8gixc4IuNYprqTejfqnZW_hJkGnWAC7o6Q> <xmx:W0vkW7Buw7UpcYixRYDqxC5S-FDjAtPGdUHk6BVaTaWkBMW8naHAxA> <xmx:W0vkW0ESVkOk7rmL-y_6WlqjHm0y2A4rbOhxfHg6QNcZpVyDHYjQog> <xmx:W0vkW-nQ8XNi0AIp_EdShyZBmXsikt15oDQJzvPsgcb5c1vNwzPQlQ>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E31EA2030B; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 09:42:34 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
Message-Id: <b05facc0-6009-436a-af15-ca28871ef850@sloti7d1t02>
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.5-610-gd7ceb27-fmstable-20181026v1
X-Me-Personality: 56629417
In-Reply-To: <39901AFF-A720-4251-873C-A9604B5B5154@iki.fi>
References: <222011778.12006.1541435419815@appsuite.open-xchange.com> <c877cb70-125a-4494-8d42-56c91b6e0bc0@sloti7d1t02> <39901AFF-A720-4251-873C-A9604B5B5154@iki.fi>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 09:42:34 -0500
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="a16a15d45e4c4b82b2c654eb3bef365b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/t0IxhWYgvD4e94NP7A0U6Qtex-E>
Subject: Re: [Extra] SNIPPET (now PREVIEW) draft update
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2018 14:42:40 -0000

The arguments for octets are storage space and network traffic, which is octets, but I do see your point. Should we say 255 characters maximum then - obviously servers can still do less, and clients can choose to truncate. 
 
Either way, we'll make sure JMAP aligns. 
 Bron. 
 
On Fri, Nov 9, 2018, at 01:08, Timo Sirainen wrote: 
> Hmm. You're talking about octets and so far Dovecot (and Michael's draft) has been talking about characters. So with a maximum of 4 bytes per UTF-8 character and Dovecot's current 100 character limit, it could already be sending 400 octets.. 
>  
> We chose characters rather than octets because it makes more sense from the client's point of view to show approximately the same amount of text no matter what characters are being used. 
>  
>> On 8 Nov 2018, at 14.03, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> wrote: 
>>  
>> Hi Michael, 
>>  
>> Thanks again for submitting this, and apologies that I haven't done a thorough review yet - it's on my todo list and I expect to do so soon. 
>>  
>> The ONLY remaining question was length. 200 is good, but JMAP says 255 and consistency will make it better. Unless you have a strong reason to lock it down to 200, would you consider changing it to "no more than 255 octets" with an understanding that there's no requirement that servers have to store that much, just that clients must be willing to accept that much. That will keep everything consistent. 
>>  
>> Other than this, we believe we're ready to take this document to working group last call, which I intend to do once I've heard back from you - it's easy to fix this up during last call. 
>>  
>> Thanks for your work and for getting us the update in time for this meeting. 
>>  
>> Cheers, 
>>  
>> Bron. 
>>  
>> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018, at 03:30, Michael Slusarz wrote: 
>>> I've submitted an update to the (formerly snippet, now) preview draft incorporating feedback received from this list and other implementers. 
>>>   
>>> Main change is the name - this is now "PREVIEW" instead of "SNIPPET". Also, increased recommended preview size to 200 characters (previously: 100). 
>>>   
>>> Will not be able to remotely join IETF 103 meeting as I am traveling, but wanted to make sure this draft was updated before then. 
>>>  
>>> michael 
>>>  
>>> _______________________________________________ 
>>> Extra mailing list 
>>> Extra@ietf.org 
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra 
>>>  
>>  
>> -- 
>>  Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd 
>>   brong@fastmailteam.com 
>>  
>>  
>> _______________________________________________ 
>> Extra mailing list 
>> Extra@ietf.org 
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Extra mailing list 
> Extra@ietf.org 
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra 
>  
 
-- 
 Bron Gondwana, CEO, FastMail Pty Ltd 
 brong@fastmailteam.com