IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?

Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com> Sat, 06 June 2020 06:42 UTC

Return-Path: <brong@fastmailteam.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245793A0A7B for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:42:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmailteam.com header.b=kIgcyZjU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=ny7cA5ct
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e9-hypkZ8li0 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBEBB3A0B48 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 5 Jun 2020 23:42:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364AA5C0179 for <extra@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 02:42:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap7 ([10.202.2.57]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 02:42:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= fastmailteam.com; h=mime-version:message-id:date:from:to:subject :content-type; s=fm2; bh=Z3q20AwtESr7HYuy8EVdiQpmi2dcgVPiafg+f98 UDJc=; b=kIgcyZjUjYSuLKnckpr8HEGK9tsKU8uFEjd0hXKlMhZ7VRSLVB1v2Jf Fe0SyvsHF7tL73+jg8ABQrVSgAWVUYXM/W2vKHphcK28TJ0PGscJcAhd1A6WsAcH zZLlkYfCFgY3Rn/5W5ewOBP3AMdc+gWfU9I2Beg/Kd4LSNtqywEwhjTS95NAH97u eRQQaoHRedXWpnnBikHnTF+y+SKvpxaWpVn/9zlbXBN8d2F5Sko/Sr9T0lKuA6VK uDzWQXTuJ3HdClaepo36ko9HJ+q23SgPRqg9emJtxXI6KJYKO2Z++1ds+AdG7njc yQoJNl1zGe08bjIaIcg+Uz1BNoygo4Q==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=Z3q20AwtESr7HYuy8EVdiQpmi2dcg VPiafg+f98UDJc=; b=ny7cA5ctDrkM/WiVNdiOf6a3H17Vhvel9Btcf4/5E27aU nxWhRov5p709YxeLl8KpuckgHDxquiot0WP+7CWzRotKXDShm1ubPPp96iPpfYeX PjYTwvxqrmpFcSpVO0gakSYOfSKwCHdvMagEXQpaiYWyYaLJEMgMMFDTugWZ8TG5 GUsKfi5t8deYDzgRKruj6a8b+G1fV7PyP+jAZFrDn9FPVzA/eStGN27tnXflGmyu e2KHZ2VRatF1oohE1RrlHJLHREXu2O3gOZOHfJTiK++iVmQA4kYkYlFreQvFIc2Y alaVSFXzQd+HqHbxKfZSdkFMj3R3bfyvx+Jpebxlg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:wDrbXr1X0DWA6bw0eseIxTfmN_NN_XIDF6w3fZG6nmGNgeJLIwQooA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudeggedguddtfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvffutgesrgdtre erreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdeurhhonhcuifhonhgufigrnhgrfdcuoegsrhhonhhgsehf rghsthhmrghilhhtvggrmhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepvdetteeiveeihf egiedtgeeigfduveelhefgffelgeelueehhfeitdelgedtffegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfu ihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepsghrohhnghesfhgrshhtmhgrih hlthgvrghmrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:wTrbXqFFuygeW7pcJ8LZQn9g-4qMnMdU5ipDqNalA9xDuqdOxasJ3g> <xmx:wTrbXr6jF15Wprr0fQXsHQvHlfd4BDwATQzrd1NKXycQRVCBnAQzNA> <xmx:wTrbXg3YOEnoLUf8QTHYdUrF_UXP76tXU-p-XbOSW68awxPovF8Mdg> <xmx:wTrbXqHWWy2k8Bsp6UavllnRwx7v63y9224f5Zp4-zqM_deMUtpLgA>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id E26DA180091; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 02:42:08 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-519-g0f677ba-fm-20200601.001-g0f677ba6
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <9d20f8a5-9441-47ba-b2f3-c2ee87f97a81@dogfood.fastmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 16:41:48 +1000
From: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bfd380c7fe794cc69648e44f78650f92"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/t0x8D0ImQ6rdfGpkaRdXMAIyzSM>
Subject: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 06:42:13 -0000

Hi Extra-ordinary people,

We have an interim meeting scheduled in a couple of weeks, where we'll be mostly talking about IMAP4rev2 I'm sure. We need to decide BEFORE then whether we will also be meeting at the IETF108 virtual meeting in not-Madrid.

Does anybody have a strong opinion on this? I'm inclined not to take up a time slot unless people thing there's valuable work which is better done during the official IETF108 times. I'll be attending anyway because I plan to run a JMAP session, but I feel that EXTRA has less need to meet during a virtual IETF.

Let me know, pretty much if anyone thinks it's going to be worth having the session I'll ask for it - they're always a pleasant way to spend some time.

Cheers,

Bron.

--
 Bron Gondwana, CEO, Fastmail Pty Ltd
 brong@fastmailteam.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email