Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ?

Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no> Fri, 01 March 2019 07:30 UTC

Return-Path: <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28D6712D4EC for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:30:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gulbrandsen.priv.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAdX3MfpPWH4 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [144.76.73.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61EBD129508 for <extra@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 23:30:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:91a8::3]) by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF7EC05E2; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:32:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gulbrandsen.priv.no; s=mail; t=1551425551; bh=yFRvZ0Ezd671wyiONDP7yTeup9FkxWp/4mRLtfZhZbI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:From; b=e4hWdL4gUshsWpQVRtbJuRfT21KJn6SpEPvjQGlBaagaV9UVMLkqUgT/+QdEEzIMN MsmSjvr/HxW6Z2hEOP36kdPG5GFft5rheC508sJuLzHL8cB7Y+uwTZ6g+QJDTPrX6f Hod88LBhA6leEI1FtAYfdW0ZYzj+P1shvTWeiIfE=
Received: from arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no by stabil.gulbrandsen.priv.no (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1551425549-26265-2661/10/9397; Fri, 1 Mar 2019 07:32:29 +0000
From: Arnt Gulbrandsen <arnt@gulbrandsen.priv.no>
To: extra@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 08:30:34 +0100
Message-Id: <AKMk6mFEu9kvnOxeceBB+vNAqqDJDq2Ha2enPbOCdtQ=.sha-256@antelope.email>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.21.1902262150050.14048@ary.local> <af25a165-ff24-41d4-810e-b00adf2092d5@beta.fastmail.com> <01R3P86JVOOM00004L@mauve.mrochek.com> <a05121fb-a105-458a-bd69-9d6c289860b2@www.fastmail.com> <20190228015702.5B252200F6CDEE@ary.local> <8ce7f4bf-805d-4fbe-8854-5381a4346b2a@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <20190228161213.D1442200F6FF92@ary.local> <01fd8d9e-fe47-453a-b4e0-f0a9d68ce43b@gulbrandsen.priv.no> <20190228211123.08E97200F73515@ary.local> <y1shk7tgwkXXGKyb6JpQGl3wBrXJSY0lcI9p8S10+Ws=.sha-256@antelope.email> <20190301001549.034DA200F759FD@ary.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/tUanYhDoKXCIAoNuTDKLhKu_oVA>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Is this a plausible IMAP extension ?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2019 07:30:44 -0000

So why not let the sender supply the logo by marking a body part, and 
then specifying when and whether to use it? Why must the logo be 
marked/inserted/supplied after the DKIM signature?

Arnt