IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit

Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> Fri, 15 September 2017 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42861321A4 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com header.b=CSi4D287; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com header.b=vlGzA8fe; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=open-xchange.com header.b=alsK56Z8
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hziY7jd-CjXj for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.open-xchange.com (alcatraz.open-xchange.com [87.191.39.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DA2A13209C for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 09:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mx2.open-xchange.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 60DC66A3EC; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:22 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1505492962; bh=qZ4KNPSqzYbs0gCWqI8z0tNnC3rn3hdmq9jcmIUK1ec=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=CSi4D287MyligVU9LxkFM6iY81RkvNT9td/1BX1adNNSsnDpnPnZNWgcgRUXxDarB wKBhFnc/t+YinRAF6M6JhFFiVyplPbWu9/OoGZ1cdU9wB06+s63P8ZHt/qnwwfI6HL m2O8Hd/RMhTMPnqgG0o6bIztOKKa15oZa3yNGa49Py9yWBM6ZMWEchseTIMS03BOjl rFWkdj9tjwkvFAt5kSOoJaZlkr7ieG6lCpTeQj/GUqB26E461FSnsNWFWmiwU7t2PR HdvULPeuU7KPlq0vNtGnIMfhbIx3/eJcQg+YILpOHeabeLIhufLRCqWOA8SpW7PL5K OJuL9Wpmv4sAg==
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4132D6A3EB for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:20 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1505492960; bh=qZ4KNPSqzYbs0gCWqI8z0tNnC3rn3hdmq9jcmIUK1ec=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=vlGzA8fe3/eytMio3ZHJk61s4JOxxh+dd9s6oYVLK61pjlWic9w5gmf6I218DVy/1 4ThRYDFDb8opTLHu4R3uvbsJSUsAgNw88Luq8lHJwdXBpTXDHrze0NcYUSfnJGqil+ lAtpY7vn5RN9vx6BxRemZsDGLwPfw6Cd35IbJk/fDcnj0hNSfk381XyT4ldEFAGQND hDvyzTlBXqotRo8XHzkJH8jinvbRUA4ttLXKAUHAQVRpatuja52B7gnpDi/HqSBM/L STwq9/ZZeAZugrxCPh5GC8LlnCVKRUGI/ycSSWzJ4RrFBFROBAxBbcOVHNzRCQoBwS eYcAsm84Ap4eg==
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=mx2.open-xchange.com) by localhost with ESMTP (eXpurgate 4.1.8) (envelope-from <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>) id 59bbffdf-034f-7f000001272a-7f000001b104-1 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:19 +0200
Received: from open-xchange.com (imap.open-xchange.com [10.20.30.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB8716A3E5 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=open-xchange.com; s=201705; t=1505492959; bh=qZ4KNPSqzYbs0gCWqI8z0tNnC3rn3hdmq9jcmIUK1ec=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From; b=alsK56Z8lmse+29iNShot9m4R0ttMfeAsKTg6boI2/NPetNUYDyXNPgxyrZopdf91 gNshAgb27LPGYKJNhWr0BoVwvbqsVfq93OtaHElFJsBM6akGDrtl9+ENFanA0DKsub KqmUdVyRdssPqGmxRhtXeclFZhcnf0TJHUjp1M6w8iP0ZBWM/dgara5V+84QiuPrhk 6l0Pz14J0vOSBRzb29rJZsfEJQE2zvYmwnPML2H6Id+MqZ1/2Kpb+n5tKNoA3IrGQg gYuIm+6yZWXPnDc534Xsd+EzQakmNF4D6SZ56LxP3X5UE2cNIt6HJviwl4I9Uxn71+ VXOCo7xHHXrLw==
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2C23C0D57 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from open-xchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap.open-xchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RoblAEfLKh7C for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from null (appsuite-gw4.open-xchange.com [192.168.110.160]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by open-xchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B8A253C05C9 for <extra@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Sep 2017 18:29:19 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 10:29:18 -0600
From: Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
To: extra@ietf.org
Message-ID: <712044986.2363.1505492959243@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <DA5AEDAF-E697-4116-856C-AED989301055@att.com>
References: <0871fcf6-f0c5-a4b7-f1e4-7a535d78d776@rename-it.nl> <DA5AEDAF-E697-4116-856C-AED989301055@att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Medium
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.8.4-Rev11
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-purgate-ID: 151428::1505492960-0000034F-650DFED2/0/0
X-purgate-type: clean
X-purgate-size: 799
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate: clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/uRAUw_HnQf_h72KyJF6umLIiYqI>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Some comments on draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:29:27 -0000

> On September 15, 2017 at 10:25 AM "HANSEN, TONY L" <tony@att.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/15/17, 12:07 PM, "Extra on behalf of Stephan Bosch" <extra-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of stephan@rename-it.nl> wrote:
> 
>     I gave draft-ietf-extra-imap-64bit a quick look. I have a few comments 
> 
> 
> I too have a couple comments. If it’s called the 64bit extension, why are the numbers limited to 63 bits? Why not the full 64-bit range?
> 
> I’m sure there’s a good reason (or perhaps not).

Probably for the same reasons outlined here:

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7162#section-3.1

Although that design decision should be made explicit in the text of this graph (or at least a reference to decision as outlined in 7162).

michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email