IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 10 June 2020 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798673A07B6 for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLiBs2J5LJcP for <extra@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from statler.isode.com (Statler.isode.com [62.232.206.189]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D75F3A07B1 for <extra@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1591793443; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=siNH89lAKnjtQxVhPoBz68GOhfszrU3/SEcQwLUhC68=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=vYwBKIkcm5X+QhprluC37FmloSSvuYmmxfNCD/6JohXytMj/ltUKmoHVETC2TERlICzQiY Hizzf9pcMwJgBtjaqruZNRJZh6AI8QRec0fKn13aaCwI9vV+dxlE9dmTRsEYqa+QKJIC2Y ELnSblyZUhzJLA39Y9T4ditJ+Y5GcEg=;
Received: from [172.27.248.7] (connect.isode.net [172.20.0.72]) by statler.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <XuDXHQA9sSMt@statler.isode.com>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:50:41 +0100
To: Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, extra@ietf.org
References: <9d20f8a5-9441-47ba-b2f3-c2ee87f97a81@dogfood.fastmail.com>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <345bfd7c-f16e-c9b2-1697-da66929086d0@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:50:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To: <9d20f8a5-9441-47ba-b2f3-c2ee87f97a81@dogfood.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7066F2A2899E4EC2E35D291B"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/uXPCRBNU9hn1emYFiQbYx98tXGI>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:50:46 -0000

Hi Bron,

On 06/06/2020 07:41, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Hi Extra-ordinary people,
>
> We have an interim meeting scheduled in a couple of weeks, where we'll 
> be mostly talking about IMAP4rev2 I'm sure.  We need to decide BEFORE 
> then whether we will also be meeting at the IETF108 virtual meeting in 
> not-Madrid.
>
> Does anybody have a strong opinion on this?  I'm inclined not to take 
> up a time slot unless people thing there's valuable work which is 
> better done during the official IETF108 times.  I'll be attending 
> anyway because I plan to run a JMAP session, but I feel that EXTRA has 
> less need to meet during a virtual IETF.
>
> Let me know, pretty much if anyone thinks it's going to be worth 
> having the session I'll ask for it - they're always a pleasant way to 
> spend some time.

I think it will really depend on what actions items we come up after the 
EXTRA session next week and AD review of IMAP4rev2.

Maybe ask for a shared slot between JMAP and EXTRA?

Best Regards,

Alexey

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email