Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?

Alexey Melnikov <> Wed, 10 June 2020 12:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 798673A07B6 for <>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZLiBs2J5LJcP for <>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D75F3A07B1 for <>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 05:50:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1591793443;; s=june2016;; bh=siNH89lAKnjtQxVhPoBz68GOhfszrU3/SEcQwLUhC68=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=vYwBKIkcm5X+QhprluC37FmloSSvuYmmxfNCD/6JohXytMj/ltUKmoHVETC2TERlICzQiY Hizzf9pcMwJgBtjaqruZNRJZh6AI8QRec0fKn13aaCwI9vV+dxlE9dmTRsEYqa+QKJIC2Y ELnSblyZUhzJLA39Y9T4ditJ+Y5GcEg=;
Received: from [] ( []) by (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <>; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:50:41 +0100
To: Bron Gondwana <>,
References: <>
From: Alexey Melnikov <>
Message-ID: <>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 13:50:20 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0
In-Reply-To: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------7066F2A2899E4EC2E35D291B"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Do we need a session at IETF108?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:50:46 -0000

Hi Bron,

On 06/06/2020 07:41, Bron Gondwana wrote:
> Hi Extra-ordinary people,
> We have an interim meeting scheduled in a couple of weeks, where we'll 
> be mostly talking about IMAP4rev2 I'm sure.  We need to decide BEFORE 
> then whether we will also be meeting at the IETF108 virtual meeting in 
> not-Madrid.
> Does anybody have a strong opinion on this?  I'm inclined not to take 
> up a time slot unless people thing there's valuable work which is 
> better done during the official IETF108 times.  I'll be attending 
> anyway because I plan to run a JMAP session, but I feel that EXTRA has 
> less need to meet during a virtual IETF.
> Let me know, pretty much if anyone thinks it's going to be worth 
> having the session I'll ask for it - they're always a pleasant way to 
> spend some time.

I think it will really depend on what actions items we come up after the 
EXTRA session next week and AD review of IMAP4rev2.

Maybe ask for a shared slot between JMAP and EXTRA?

Best Regards,