Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 21 September 2020 02:52 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9203A11E4; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:52:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VI6tGJ8Rjkfu; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:52:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vs1-f48.google.com (mail-vs1-f48.google.com [209.85.217.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1125A3A11E3; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-vs1-f48.google.com with SMTP id a16so7222779vsp.12; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:52:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hws4oPuX/2DmxeIpHZLVSN7jwsvaiQIaSCdrzYdwrRY=; b=r/FMUubkiAd+dHqB4muxyYBz9wYpgQ+iVxtkAro5QY21qSGyffyEmyRO+YqybpD5GI bfUfehcUVHaWZcDg+bxSkxUn0uKWmCeXxeGeEGCgTzHNms73zQK4xATXj8nV14pHwY3J KKiKXWVcV/aElP5PeArDICp0vyfDRvaC12hhAaf1m+zOQMgFdZEhLd8iwolbuoHYz1J1 06V1Rv4H06eElwebJCMGm9SLg9Nma2udBBbqEB8UapqwsxZIk5jDe+LyWZB2gLfPzfzG RYe7q1TTrmtRZOuOpDVNeTkyPNSFrkQqx38MxTSbEQ46ljpxE1CS2L8vk6zEtxgZqsgl w56A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530D1CmKIqgMUivDrgzdG4PYENO9V/n4GQV1KPeo3cwOv5HAQAqT kKJ9423eOThx9wsLGCWkaPnI9Ot0w+VrvcF/wzXmXa9D
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8OefGm7aVl/G/DwCQ0QEWrgasrqIKIdY4cMtcEiHDnzMae9GRqQlMFE0Mb2YxaUjncHFVq9u+rjm+7zpNHmY=
X-Received: by 2002:a67:f9d6:: with SMTP id c22mr16476301vsq.49.1600656746854; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 19:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160020314948.26909.8626308879432538042@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALaySJK8yz1mOjR1FQ7iTBM2SaTjWOg3Vh==TZTrRBQNL9Zq7g@mail.gmail.com> <149164507.10800.1600655734767@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
In-Reply-To: <149164507.10800.1600655734767@appsuite.open-xchange.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 22:52:15 -0400
Message-ID: <CALaySJJhnd1=ka0NKMLMz37Xgw7u-6_9S2xq=R_rd-iupdKefg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Slusarz <michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com>
Cc: Meral Shirazipour <meral.shirazipour@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview.all@ietf.org, extra@ietf.org, gen-art@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cdbe2b05afc9f047"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/vz9KfRJ-EFwNFGUkoM06RyHKdYM>
Subject: Re: [Extra] [EXT] Re: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 02:52:30 -0000

That looks good to me, Michael.

Barry

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:35 PM Michael Slusarz <
michael.slusarz@open-xchange.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> How about changing the first paragraph of Section 3.2 to the following:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "The server returns a variable-length string that is the generated preview
> for that message.  This string is intended to be viewed by the user as a
> contextual preview of the entire message, and is not intended to be
> interpreted in any way by the client software."
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Slightly altered Barry's wording - "user" is already defined in Section 2
> as the human user, so to be consistent I think we should use "user" instead
> of "end-user".
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09/15/2020 3:26 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Meral, thanks for the review.  The document does say in the first sentence
> of the Introduction that the preview is for the end user.  I agree that it
> would be useful to emphasize that, though, and I think the right place to
> do it is by adding to the first paragraph of Section 3.2 something like the
> following: “The preview string is meant to help the end-user, and is not
> intended to be interpreted in any way by the client software.”
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Barry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 4:52 PM Meral Shirazipour via Datatracker <
> noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
>
>
>
>
>
> Review result: Ready with Nits
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
>
>
>
>
>
> Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
>
>
>
>
>
> by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
>
>
>
>
>
> like any other last call comments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information, please see the FAQ at
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Document: draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09
>
>
>
>
>
> Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
>
>
>
>
>
> Review Date: 2020-09-15
>
>
>
>
>
> IETF LC End Date: 2020-09-14
>
>
>
>
>
> IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Summary: This draft is ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but I
> have
>
>
>
>
>
> some comments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Major issues:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Minor issues:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nits/editorial comments: In Section 4.2, it would have been good to give
> some
>
>
>
>
>
> example and advice on when the client uses the preview to take some
> action. Is
>
>
>
>
>
> this to be avoided? (Was not very clear to me).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
> Meral Shirazipour
>
>
>
>
>
> www.ericsson.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>