Re: [Extra] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate-01: (with COMMENT)

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

On Fri, Oct 05, 2018 at 03:45:06PM +0200, Stephan Bosch wrote:
> Hello Mr. Kaduk,
> 
> Op 25-9-2018 om 16:11 schreef Benjamin Kaduk:
> > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for
> > draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate-01: No Objection
> >
> > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> > introductory paragraph, however.)
> >
> >
> > Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> >
> >
> > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-extra-imap-savedate/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > COMMENT:
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Section 1
> >
> >     to permanently remove (expunge) all messages in that Trash mailbox
> >     deleted before a certain time (e.g. a configurable expiration
> >
> > nit: comma after "e.g.".
> OK.
> 
> >
> > Section 4.2
> >
> > Should there be an example for the 'NIL response' case?
> 
> I don't think that is highly important, but I guess we can add a small 
> example for that. The modified text will then be something like:
> 
>     Example for selected mailbox with SAVEDATE support:
> 
>           C: A101 FETCH 998 (SAVEDATE)
>           S: * 998 FETCH (SAVEDATE "01-Jan-2015 18:50:53 +0100")
>           S: A101 OK Fetch completed.
> 
>     Example for selected mailbox without SAVEDATE support:
> 
>           C: A101 FETCH 123 (SAVEDATE)
>           S: * 123 FETCH (SAVEDATE NIL)
>           S: A101 OK Fetch completed.

This was just a question I had while reading, and I'm not sure what the
best path is.  I promise to not be offended if you leave this example out
-- do what you think is best.  I do appreciate seeing what the example
looks like, even here in mail, though -- thank you!

-Benjamin