Re: [Extra] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with COMMENT)

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Tue, 22 September 2020 07:21 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEDC3A145B; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xmN_iTOUFo6U; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33DD53A145D; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id u48so5179964uau.0; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IAHZPloURIer9fnlIL32pDlonPp59mS4ilZcfC5bhTM=; b=DmfyLQTi7NTzv+yARgf0xtqQzF5Ax7gLzJjzV+3orpbFnD34nyegbQfa9KU/3GH5Ch wKxp73dXA+U9ScruGJ4p0jmVeTa5t+i2GCzJduUkiZwwwepIU3d9rbu+mdWthJ/XwtzU CDIkIWA5ZL+A5lLtCcL9FaxyeNpFw6mMu0yfcENsszSfiam+3jGQjOdJEsB8+mcrRSQD PRW0B2Tqkewi4db9GNg4+j0lk0JEHdwtRK2rukmc76Tc6l1642l4otzMX5HnRXJ66bzE IKaDtQJbk78EDk8NC6p8hLFgGTljg01ajKggjlXGtIlVIV0f/l/RSnxeQSsBwDhLF5Xj QQbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IAHZPloURIer9fnlIL32pDlonPp59mS4ilZcfC5bhTM=; b=sYGWrKeNWmkITybw4WyVEXfShEsDsgeG6XFiWtNAzCnifijKz5iZsWbpRG5yVBBMT/ L8drBkzlol9guco1Fo/goRtEB3IcOgGnqBuNC/uHHpIoDWlF/VkgLdxOqhZqix3iaJDr 656N54NJ3Daa3chif4iEcAjtRzs3GkxLQMaaZ/8tssHvz7/FmYyUv/SqrGWvD8C8NhYr 6mpi3sRj8TfhkSj8rkp74c7UYtTe2VkX2jATZAe4zoHfbep4SxJcCtIfPX+ktJd8sE5H JYZX17cbycfnZewpXYe/FNI5FXpoR7lAOhBsIalwOETIAfgNUU3ODN67e1JOUIPAVjfR SPjA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ky7WVrrGbBahC/85ENz1r27IK7mGjombCAzDDAIMfRReqFQJ+ eQKiBg7CE4nBK/BaYY3kPLXFXUOvXkSH8RUnezk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfr8oGgiAr2GQROsnOqBYNbmlfPyNax7wYwbBmVPne0kT+X1p+9ZzVtWsK9upeqgGuEP+NwibDw3CMkwh6CKc=
X-Received: by 2002:a9f:24d4:: with SMTP id 78mr2247149uar.47.1600759258121; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:20:58 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160075698787.23651.14411790834126136869@ietfa.amsl.com> <20200922064638.GR89563@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20200922064638.GR89563@kduck.mit.edu>
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 00:20:39 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwZRRb9Jum-Hn2rmMU=bdjJMngbnz698hOhbz7gBErq39g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, extra@ietf.org, Bron Gondwana <brong@fastmailteam.com>, extra-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f38aa505afe1cee4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/z8d0A_c8BnU9bsFDI7Vam63a4nc>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap-fetch-preview-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 07:21:01 -0000

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:46 PM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> We may have found more fodder for the "different IESG (member)s give
> different advice at different times" bin, as we've had ADs ask for registry
> URLs in the past, to help identify the registry in question.
>

I'd never seen URLs included prior to the last few months.  It's been
strange to start seeing them.

The URLs seem redundant to me.  The name of the registry or sub-registry is
what's canonical, not the URL.

We could ask IANA if they have a preference, I suppose.

-MSK