Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 10 February 2021 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: extra@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BDF3A10F5; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:48:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JlKbq3yotQQ0; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961623A110A; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 09:48:51 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1612979329; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=P99iK21PBx2OKUtzbU61xKuIwnGpOwDBaHftDV+Dmu8=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=q3VZHRCCLwK++eQxPK0+aA+WnjeD+4HV+mQyfwz/7bptwzUKPLsDYwcPR0ASxHVrypEj2a XgXnwP4Ns2Jx3eeYVIV4rpST10a0bMl4SfGKvyLlwATpM8YstMisTYxEWouuF+XiJESzbR 7Kulul1+oCc9usJQZMT5tBOLGnFRgT4=;
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (4e697ac1.skybroadband.com [78.105.122.193]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <YCQcgAAuQSNd@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:48:49 +0000
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: extra@ietf.org, brong@fastmailteam.com, draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2@ietf.org, extra-chairs@ietf.org
References: <161227892696.22043.1613107216198518224@ietfa.amsl.com>
Message-ID: <9c21efd1-e1c3-a8de-fc33-aafb6df85a7b@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:48:48 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0
In-Reply-To: <161227892696.22043.1613107216198518224@ietfa.amsl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/extra/zEYY4fzRepozrFnBoF81XTqcK7w>
Subject: Re: [Extra] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-extra-imap4rev2-26: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: extra@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Email mailstore and eXtensions To Revise or Amend <extra.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/extra/>
List-Post: <mailto:extra@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/extra>, <mailto:extra-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:48:54 -0000

Hi Roman,

Replying to to the rest of your comments:

On 02/02/2021 15:15, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker wrote:
> ** Section 11.2.  Per “For this reason, IMAP4rev2 clients SHOULD try both ports
> 993 and 143 (and both IPv4 and IPv6) concurrently by default, unless overriden
> [sic] by either user configuration or DNS SRV records [RFC6186]”, is there any
> further guidance needed here to guide if say both 993 and 143 respond; or you
> get responses across address families?

I think I would like to stick the Happy Eyeballs reference here: RFC 
8305 (Happy Eyeballs Version 2: Better Connectivity Using Concurrency).


Best Regards,
Alexey