Re: IP over FDDI comments
vjs%rhyolite.wpd@sgi.com (Vernon Schryver) Fri, 02 February 1990 20:33 UTC
Received: from merit.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa11769; 2 Feb 90 15:33 EST
Received: Fri, 2 Feb 90 15:34:56 EST from ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU by merit.edu (5.59/1.6)
Received: from sgi.com by ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (5.61/1.41) id AA20282; Fri, 2 Feb 90 12:34:48 -0800
Received: from whizzer.sgi.com by sgi.sgi.com (5.52/891101.SGI) for @ucbvax.berkeley.edu:fddi@merit.edu id AA09251; Fri, 2 Feb 90 12:34:13 PST
Received: from rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com by whizzer.wpd.sgi.com (5.52/891101.SGI) for sgi.sgi.com!pescadero.stanford.edu!deering id AA25914; Fri, 2 Feb 90 12:34:10 PST
Received: by rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com (5.52/891101.SGI) for @whizzer.wpd.sgi.com:fddi@merit.edu id AA01188; Fri, 2 Feb 90 12:34:03 PST
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1990 12:34:03 -0800
From: vjs%rhyolite.wpd@sgi.com
Message-Id: <9002022034.AA01188@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com>
To: deering@pescadero.stanford.edu
Subject: Re: IP over FDDI comments
Cc: cei@enr.prime.com, dhunt@enr.prime.com, fddi@merit.edu, rj@rhyolite.wpd.sgi.com
Status: O
> From: Steve Deering <deering@pescadero.stanford.edu> > Subject: Re: IP over FDDI comments > > What you say is absolutely correct, > but you miss the point -- the Hunt/Iturralde proposal insists on > allowing single-MAC stations on either ring *AND* treating the pair > of rings as a single IP subnet. Oops. Sorry. It had not penetrated that SM stations would be allowed on the back ring. Using a single IP network for a dual ring with DAS/SM stations on the back ring seems so strange that I will assume that it is a typo in the proposal. I will hereafter assume that my previous misunderstanding is correct interpretation of the intended proposal. It would be nice to hear from Prime if I'm wrong. > In case you haven't noticed, I have dropped my earlier opposition to your > scheme of treating the two rings as two IP subnets. Again, sorry. I had not realized you were agreeing. Does this mean that my wonderful ideas for "fixing" everyone else's proposals go in the bit bucket? vjs
- IP over FDDI comments Steve Deering
- Re: IP over FDDI comments Vernon Schryver
- Re: IP over FDDI comments Steve Deering
- Re: IP over FDDI comments Vernon Schryver
- Re: IP over FDDI comments Steve Deering
- Re: IP over FDDI comments Vernon Schryver