Status of IP over FDDI

Kenneth Virgile <ken%signet.uucp@think.com> Thu, 20 December 1990 18:14 UTC

Received: from merit.edu by NRI.NRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09550; 20 Dec 90 13:14 EST
Received: Thu, 20 Dec 90 13:13:37 EST from Mail.Think.COM by merit.edu (5.59/1.6)
Return-Path: <ken%signet.uucp@Think.COM>
Received: from Think.COM by mail.think.com; Thu, 20 Dec 90 13:13:33 -0500
Received: from signet.UUCP by Early-Bird.Think.COM; Thu, 20 Dec 90 13:13:31 EST
Received: from leigh.signet.UUCP (sigma10) by signet.UUCP (4.0/SMI-4.0) id AA04768; Thu, 20 Dec 90 12:21:50 EST
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 90 12:21:50 EST
From: Kenneth Virgile <ken%signet.uucp@think.com>
Message-Id: <9012201721.AA04768@signet.UUCP>
To: FDDI@merit.edu
Subject: Status of IP over FDDI
Status: O

What's the status of "A Proposed Standard for the
Transmission of IP Datagrams over FDDI Networks"?

Does RFC 1042 have precedence?

Since DEC encountered an Apple problem with the Protocol
ID of 0-0-0, has a new proposed standard been published?

Ken