Kim Soo-Nyun <> Mon, 07 June 1993 12:23 UTC

Received: from by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22179; 7 Jun 93 8:23 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa22175; 7 Jun 93 8:23 EDT
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa28119; 7 Jun 93 8:23 EDT
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA11222; Mon, 7 Jun 93 06:11:04 -0400
X-Resent-To: fddi-mib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Mon, 7 Jun 1993 06:11:02 EDT
Errors-To: owner-fddi-mib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA11074; Mon, 7 Jun 93 06:10:10 -0400
Received: from ( by (4.1/KUM-0.1) id AA21449; Mon, 7 Jun 93 19:09:35 KST
Received: from by (4.1/DARI-0.1) id AA03711; Mon, 7 Jun 93 19:51:13 KDT
Received: by (4.1/GSIC-4.0) id AA06552; Mon, 7 Jun 93 20:05:47 KDT
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 93 20:05:47 KDT
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Kim Soo-Nyun <>
MMDF-Warning: Parse error in original version of preceding line at CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-Id: <>

Hello someone concerned Bridge

I have a question about the MIB-II's interface related counts of FDDI
interface in bridge.

Let's suppose there is a FDDI-to-Ethernet bridge.
When a frame arrive in a FDDI interface of bridge,
the destination address of this frame be compared with
filtering database for determining forwarding or
discarding by relay entity.
Do above frame cause the ifInUcastPkts, ifInNUcastPkts,
ifInOctets's increament?

If a bridge is Ethernet-to-Ethernet bridge, those count
should be incremented.
But if a bridge is FDDI-to-Ethernet bridge, I doubt the
FDDI interface count all octets in ring.

Please comment my question.

Soo N. Kim
GoldStar Information and Communications

  •   Kim Soo-Nyun