IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan

"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Fri, 18 January 2008 19:56 UTC

Return-path: <fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFxKT-0006CL-VQ; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:56:41 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFxKS-0006Bz-2c for fecframe-proto@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:56:40 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-6.cisco.com ([171.71.176.117]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JFxKR-0001f1-0U for fecframe-proto@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:56:39 -0500
Received: from sj-dkim-4.cisco.com ([171.71.179.196]) by sj-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 18 Jan 2008 11:56:38 -0800
Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com (sj-core-5.cisco.com [171.71.177.238]) by sj-dkim-4.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m0IJucPs024491; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 11:56:38 -0800
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m0IJu4tN001309; Fri, 18 Jan 2008 19:56:38 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-20b.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.53]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:56:36 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 14:56:35 -0500
Message-ID: <15B86BC7352F864BB53A47B540C089B604C343AD@xmb-rtp-20b.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <38c19b540801181055m2e6990c4r4da743f2942afd8a@mail.gmail.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan
Thread-Index: AchaA7ilumVLBneeQ3aG0NpUi84e6AABSDRA
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>, "Ali Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2008 19:56:36.0393 (UTC) FILETIME=[3B78A990:01C85A0C]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=8467; t=1200686198; x=1201550198; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim4002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rajiva@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Rajiv=20Asati=20(rajiva)=22=20<rajiva@cisco.com > |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[FECFRAME-PROTO]=20Proto-team=20meeting =20in=20Jan |Sender:=20; bh=nHux6/qYma3Jgb+Fmyl5m3Dlf6UyEXboYwhyH4SmdFU=; b=JDlyc89PVQeXQGnEmXyHka1EyRlDoyC2FWjnXHy+RjphXTgXRQWMa695fs x9OI/IA9hlu+mQEKagRtqgkIZGCuXnGRbmAw0C8bBYOdEEOl0YdnVNiNDbT5 eVsrduuwIP;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=rajiva@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim4002 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 40161b1d86420e0807d771943d981d25
Cc: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fecframe protocol design team <fecframe-proto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto>, <mailto:fecframe-proto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/fecframe-proto>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe-proto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-proto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto>, <mailto:fecframe-proto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Greg,

I won't be able to make it to SJ. 

I can reserve the local telepresence room in RTP. Please reserve one in
SJ.

Cheers,
Rajiv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Shepherd [mailto:gjshep@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 1:55 PM
> To: Ali Begen (abegen)
> Cc: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan
> 
> I think Ali point about having time for a follow-up is most critical
> here. And sorry if this doesn't fit everyone's ideal schedule..
> 
> Let's plan on:
> 
> Tues, Jan 29th, 9:00PST, Cisco San Jose, Bldg 16
> 
> We can request a telepresence room for those who can't make this date
> IF you feel you can make it to another cisco telepresence location for
> the meeting. Please let me know.
> 
> I'll follow-up with a room number, and arrange to meet 
> everyone in the lobby.
> 
> Thanks!,
> Greg
> 
> On Jan 17, 2008 1:56 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > So far:
> >
> > On Jan 17, 2008 1:47 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > So, either
> > >
> > > Feb 11-15
> > Ulas
> > Shep
> > Ali (15)
> > Mark
> >
> > > or
> > >
> > > Jan 28-Feb1
> > Ulas
> > Shep
> > Ali
> > Mark
> >
> >
> >
> > > Please reply all asap.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Greg
> > >
> > >
> > > On Jan 17, 2008 1:36 PM, Ali Begen (abegen) 
> <abegen@cisco.com> wrote:
> > > > I guess my unavailable dates were caught up in the 
> previous emails. I
> > > > will be in Houston for the SMPTE/VSF conference from 
> Sunday Feb 10th and
> > > > Thursday Feb 14th. Under these circumstances, Friday 
> 15th works for me.
> > > >
> > > > I also would like to re-iterate that Feb 15th. Is very 
> close to the IETF
> > > > deadlines. So, we won't have the chance for a follow-up 
> meeting via
> > > > teleconference, etc.
> > > >
> > > > It would be ideal if we could make it before the week 
> starting Feb 4th.
> > > >
> > > > -acbegen
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Greg Shepherd [mailto:gjshep@gmail.com]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:46 AM
> > > > > To: Marshall Eubanks
> > > > > Cc: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Proto-team meeting in Jan
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay EVERYONE.. ;-)
> > > > >
> > > > > It looks like the week of Feb 11th is best. The east-coasters
> > > > > may prefer Tuesday the 12th to avoid flying on Sunday I'll
> > > > > propose that first.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tuesday, Feb 12th, 9:00 AM PST
> > > > > Cisco SJ Bldg 16
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll follow-up with a room number.
> > > > >
> > > > > Greg
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jan 17, 2008 10:38 AM, Marshall Eubanks
> > > > > <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 17, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Mark Watson wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > February 4th to February 8th incl. are bad for me. Any
> > > > > time in the
> > > > > > > week beginning February 11th would be ideal.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And me as well (both the bad and good periods).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Marshall
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > ...Mark
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 1/17/08 10:27 AM, "Greg Shepherd" 
> <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >> Mark,
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Sorry, can  you please reply and use actual dates? Which
> > > > > works for
> > > > > > >> you the week of
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Feb 4th
> > > > > > >> or
> > > > > > >> Feb 11th
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> Thanks,
> > > > > > >> Greg
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >> On Jan 8, 2008 10:29 AM, Mark Watson 
> <mark@digitalfountain.com>
> > > > > > >> wrote:
> > > > > > >>> Last week in Jan/2nd Week in Feb are good for me.
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> ...Mark
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>> On 1/8/08 10:18 AM, "Greg Shepherd" 
> <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>> On Jan 8, 2008 10:09 AM, Mark Watson 
> <mark@digitalfountain.com>
> > > > > > >>>> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>> That week is ATIS IIF, and so not good for me.
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> ...Mark
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Which week is bad? Which week is good?
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>> Greg
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>>> On 1/8/08 9:58 AM, "Greg Shepherd" 
> <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Marshall,
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Are you willing to be the talking head this time?
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> I'll be in SJ on Feb 4th for another 
> meeting, so Feb 5th or
> > > > > > >>>>>> later that week works for me.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> How does this work for the rest of you? We 
> need to nail this
> > > > > > >>>>>> down soon. Also, this is a proto-team 
> meeting and not a WG
> > > > > > >>>>>> interim meeting.
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>>> Greg
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> On Jan 2, 2008 1:17 PM, Marshall Eubanks
> > > > > > >>>>>> <tme@multicasttech.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2007, at 10:58 AM, Marshall 
> Eubanks wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I have just learned that I probably will have to
> > > > > be in Europe
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> for February 4th and 5th.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> I should know for sure by tomorrow.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Yep, Helsinki,
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Monday and Tuesday 4-5 February.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Where does this leave the interim ?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>> Marshall
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> Marshall
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> On Dec 7, 2007, at 5:01 PM, Greg Shepherd wrote:
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> I spoke with a few of you after the WG 
> meeting about the
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> next steps, and using two more interim 
> meetings (or one
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> meeting and one
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> concall)
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> before Philly to keep us on task.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> The first/best week for me next year is the last
> > > > > week of Jan
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> / first week of Feb. SJ worked well for most of
> > > > > the group.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> :) Or are there other suggestions of a 
> host location?
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Please let me know what your Jan/Feb look 
> like so we can
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> nail down a date before the year starts 
> to fill up.
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> Greg
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>> 
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > > > > >>>>>>>> 
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> > > > > > >>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > > > > >>>>>> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > > > > >>>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > > > > >>>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>>
> > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> > > > > FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> > > > > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
> FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
> 

_______________________________________________
FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email