Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on fec grouping issues

["Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ali,

Two quick comments -

Perhaps, we should move the text related to requirements in a separate
section from the Introduction section for better readability.

Also, 3.2 and 3.3 are new, hence, they are not really "issues" or
limitations with existing mechanisms. Perhaps, we could move them into
"Requirements" section for completeness and clarify there. 

Cheers,
Rajiv

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ali Begen (abegen) 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:45 AM
> To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); '[e-mail]'
> Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on 
> fec grouping issues
> 
> Hi Rajiv,
> 
> Thanks for reading the draft. For other who have not started 
> reading, pls see the updated version (attached).
> 
> I asked someone without any FEC background to comment on the 
> draft (seems that we will have the same issue in MMUSIC). So, 
> I expanded the intro part and make clarifications about what 
> we meant with prioritization, additivity, etc.
> 
> Thanks again,
> -acbegen
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva) 
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 5:36 AM
> > To: Ali Begen (abegen); '[e-mail]'
> > Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on 
> > fec grouping issues
> > 
> > Hi Ali,
> > 
> > That's fine. 
> > I just got to see the draft. Looks fine to me.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Rajiv
> >  
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Ali Begen (abegen)
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:28 PM
> > > To: Rajiv Asati (rajiva); '[e-mail]'
> > > Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on fec 
> > > grouping issues
> > > 
> > > This is just for describing the problem and showing some 
> > alternative 
> > > solutions. It does not have to become anything.
> > > That's why, it is intended to be informational.
> > > 
> > > If MMUSIC agrees to adopt one of the solutions described 
> > here or comes 
> > > up with a new one, then of course we should work on that draft 
> > > together, which should be in the cateogry of "proposed standard."
> > > 
> > > However, note that MMUSIC WG should approve what needs to be done 
> > > here. And, that's why we need to tell them about our problems.
> > > 
> > > -acbegen
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:17 PM
> > > > To: Ali Begen (abegen); [e-mail]
> > > > Subject: RE: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on fec 
> > > > grouping issues
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Ali,
> > > > 
> > > > We (the protocol team) should all collaborate to jointly 
> > author the 
> > > > new draft, if/when it needs to be produced.
> > > > 
> > > > Also, why should it be the informational draft? 
> > > > 
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > Rajiv
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: [e-mail] 
> > > > > [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of 
> Ali Begen
> > > > > (abegen)
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 4:04 PM
> > > > > To: [e-mail]
> > > > > Subject: [FECFRAME-PROTO] A new informational draft on
> > > fec grouping
> > > > > issues
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > 
> > > > > So far, we could not ignite a discussion in the MMUSIC WG
> > > regarding
> > > > > the FEC grouping issues. So, it was suggested that I
> > > would write an
> > > > > informational draft, describe the problems and propose some 
> > > > > alternative solutions. So, that is what I did.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I am attaching the draft for your review. Note that this
> > > has to be
> > > > > submitted by Monday. So any comments within this week
> > > > (before Friday)
> > > > > would be appreciated. It is important that we convey 
> our issues 
> > > > > appropriately. So, please take a few minutes to review the
> > > > document. 
> > > > > It is very short, and should not take much time.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > -acbegen
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
_______________________________________________
FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list
[e-mail]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto