Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Comments to draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-01.txt
"Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com> Fri, 07 March 2008 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-fecframe-proto-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-fecframe-proto-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FB328C657; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.952
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.952 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.515, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dWaHbCuDB33j; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902A93A6B22; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: fecframe-proto@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe-proto@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6938428C39C for <fecframe-proto@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cQPbMjJ3qZ9Y for <fecframe-proto@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1EB83A6ACC for <fecframe-proto@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2008 06:07:28 -0800
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m27E7R72003648; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 06:07:27 -0800
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id m27E72MF008474; Fri, 7 Mar 2008 14:07:25 GMT
Received: from xmb-rtp-20b.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.53]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 09:07:13 -0500
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:06:22 -0500
Message-ID: <15B86BC7352F864BB53A47B540C089B6050FED43@xmb-rtp-20b.amer.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <15B86BC7352F864BB53A47B540C089B604F1F8D1@xmb-rtp-20b.amer.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Comments to draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-01.txt
Thread-Index: Achx1KTGZjnd1h5yRrSN+H47uPGstQOhFQzw
From: "Rajiv Asati (rajiva)" <rajiva@cisco.com>
To: fecframe-proto@ietf.org, Mark Watson <mark@digitalfountain.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Mar 2008 14:07:13.0830 (UTC) FILETIME=[8B0D2460:01C8805C]
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=3464; t=1204898848; x=1205762848; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rajiva@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Rajiv=20Asati=20(rajiva)=22=20<rajiva@cisco.com > |Subject:=20RE=3A=20[FECFRAME-PROTO]=20Comments=20to=20draf t-ietf-fecframe-framework-01.txt |Sender:=20; bh=apTvJouSfuwaUpaYkBKD9enjgfUwz+EO/+Y4Zopg72s=; b=j3L9vCkjnQKFh2Lc92+Nsbh9qbuwkO6HYZLZxTf8ekvcN1VGVNnNDVnS3f xoHIFB1MelGeuhD8+RzjwEpNdFKvC0GiBVXMAA5Ol6/uIdj3lB6y0TOlktOf A+vpeNV29dxHfjaO6mOhmcyPEDK6sFusWirapG8oPpp9ll5yJy9w4=;
Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=rajiva@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; );
Subject: Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Comments to draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-01.txt
X-BeenThere: fecframe-proto@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Fecframe protocol design team <fecframe-proto.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto>, <mailto:fecframe-proto-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/fecframe-proto>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe-proto@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-proto-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto>, <mailto:fecframe-proto-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org
Hi Mark, While we agreed in our last meeting to come up with new terms (wrt CDP etc.) that suit the architecture a bit better, we should close on it next week, if we get the chance. Let me know if I could clarify any of the comments below as well. Cheers, Rajiv > -----Original Message----- > From: fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:fecframe-proto-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rajiv > Asati (rajiva) > Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 9:27 PM > To: fecframe-proto@ietf.org > Subject: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Comments to > draft-ietf-fecframe-framework-01.txt > > Hi Mark, > > While working on the signaling draft, I reviewed the > framework-01 draft > a bit carefully, and got the following (minor) comments for our > consideration - > > ~~~~~~~~~~ > 1) Section 1- Introduction > .....It is expected that any complete content delivery protocol > specification which makes use of this framework will address these > signalling requirement(s). > > TO > .....It is expected that any complete content delivery protocol > specification which makes use of this framework will also > make use of a > signalling protocol to satisfy signalling requirement(s). The > signalling > protocol is part of the FEC framework. > > > 2) Section 4- Architecture Overview > .....The FEC framework does not define how the FEC framework > configuration information for the stream is communicated from > sender to > receiver. This must be defined by any content delivery protocol > specification as described in the following section. > > TO > .....The FEC framework defines the usage of any signaling protocol by > which FEC framework configuration information for the stream is > communicated from sender to receiver. This must be adopted by any > content delivery protocol specification making use of the FEC > Framework. > > 3) Section 6- Protocol Overview > Change the title to "Building Block Overview", since Protocol doesn't > quite convey what protocol it is. > > 4) Section 2- Terminology > > 4.1 - Clarify the definition of 'Source Payload ID' and > 'Repair Payload > ID' a bit more. For example, Repair FEC Payload ID -- A FEC Payload ID > to identify the source block and the mapping between the contained > repair data and the original source block. Source Payload ID -- A FEC > Payload ID to identify the mapping of source packet(s) with a source > block. > > 4.2 - Add definition for "Restoration Window" (based on last > meeting) as > well as "instance" (which is used heavily in SDP Elements draft). > We are freely interchanging stream and flow terms. Need to define them > and use them appropriately. Suggest to stick with Flow. > > 5) Section 6 - Protocol Specification > Are 'Source FEC Payload ID' and 'Repair Payload ID' conveyed by sender > to receiver using the singaling protocol? Are they the same? Not clear > in 6.1, 6.2 and 6.3. > > 6) Section 6.5 - Why is FEC Framework Instance not a mandatory info > The configuration information is to be formulated for each > FEC framework > instance. Hence, we should mandatorily include the "instance" > identifier, if not already. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Cheers, > Rajiv > _______________________________________________ > FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list > FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org > http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto > _______________________________________________ FECFRAME-PROTO mailing list FECFRAME-PROTO@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe-proto
- [FECFRAME-PROTO] Comments to draft-ietf-fecframe-… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)
- Re: [FECFRAME-PROTO] Comments to draft-ietf-fecfr… Rajiv Asati (rajiva)