Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC

Greg,

I read this. It looks okay, and says that the pieces should be combined in the expected manner. My only real comment would be that it feels more informational than standards track, but I leave that decision for the WG chairs.

Colin

On 22 Mar 2012, at 18:08, Greg Shepherd wrote:
> Please resound ASAP. WG Consensus requires input from the WG.
> 
> Greg
> 
> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We're halfway through the two week timer and the list has been silent.
>> We need "consensus" and that requires input from you. A vote of
>> support IS feedback too. Please respond soon so we can progress.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Greg
>> 
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> This starts a 2 week WGLC for Pseudo Content Delivery Protocol (CDP)
>>> for Protecting Multiple Source Flows in FEC Framework,
>>> draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp-02:
>>> 
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp/
>>> 
>>> Please read and respond to the list.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Greg
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe

-- 
Colin Perkins
http://csperkins.org/