[Fecframe] fecframe WGLCs
David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net> Mon, 05 March 2012 18:59 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94F0821F85D1 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:59:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.364, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYZoGQTsiBHr for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:59:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD4021F85C5 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:59:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id htQy1i0071ZXKqc56uzt9E; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:59:53 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.33] ([71.233.85.150]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id huzs1i0123Ecudz3huzsTh; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:59:53 +0000
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 13:59:50 -0500
From: David Harrington <ietfdbh@comcast.net>
To: fecframe@ietf.org
Message-ID: <CB7A7755.1CA21%ietfdbh@comcast.net>
Thread-Topic: fecframe WGLCs
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3413800792_30200244"
Subject: [Fecframe] fecframe WGLCs
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:59:58 -0000
Hi, There are multiple fecframe WGLCs running for FEC schemes. The charter is fairly clear: "The FECFrame WG may develop new FEC schemes if necessary to provide substantial performance gains for the intended applications. However the acceptance of any FEC scheme will require multiple, prior, detailed reviews of the FEC code by independent experts from both the IETF and the broader community, since it is likely that the IETF working group will not include a large enough number of suitable experts in its working set. If these reviews are positive, then Working Group acceptance of an FEC scheme work item still needs the approval of the responsible Area Director. " For the WGLC, I would like more than just a "sure I support this" email. I would like a "I have reviewed the text in this document, I have reviewed the code in this document, and this scheme significantly improves performance for a use case that is important to me, which is <>. Therefore, I support publication of this document." If you have implemented or deployed this specification, and found no problems with the specification, or plan to implement or deploy this scheme, stating that would also be helpful. Please convince me that these documents are ready for IESG Review and deserve to be published as RFCs that are IETF standards because they address real-world problems. Thanks, -- David Harrington Director, Transport Area Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Ietfdbh@comcast.net +1-603-828-1401
- [Fecframe] fecframe WGLCs David Harrington
- Re: [Fecframe] fecframe WGLCs Vincent Roca
- Re: [Fecframe] fecframe WGLCs David Harrington
- Re: [Fecframe] fecframe WGLCs Greg Shepherd