Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Mon, 09 April 2012 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C25A21F86D4 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:46:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EVhq01KjJMQd for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4776421F86C9 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:46:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; l=3296; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1333986411; x=1335196011; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=rod0ii1hPcZh02HjP3UtgRH4Bdwjwnt/xOsDvOgUt90=; b=Pgk/w6PZ4AIR0yMNmbsNkw75mbWonjBkjyx3if8qGQtvIj+7ijb6k05D PZUWmpCKEjhbhC/TuYRDO7QUGEMn728DRnvapDpMH4EeZnSteN/mjJNib bMIK+268FzJNQjF4qECT2/hfxmmRgv9FmlNswfOwOyBt14JqnKOYwxWGP Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABYEg0+tJXG8/2dsb2JhbABEuSCBB4IJAQEBBAEBAQ8BWwsMBAIBCBEEAQEBCh0HIQYLFAkIAgQBDQUIGodeAwsLmgqWFg2JU4othUpjBJZ9iiiDFIFpgmc
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,393,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="73170569"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Apr 2012 15:46:36 +0000
Received: from xht-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com (xht-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com [173.37.178.212]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q39FkaRL007533; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:46:36 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com ([169.254.3.120]) by xht-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com ([173.37.178.212]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 08:46:36 -0700
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: "Luby, Michael" <luby@qualcomm.com>, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>
Thread-Topic: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHM9Y5oYUTwcglnikao6K4vFs4/VpZchu8AgBqw5ACAG+ZYgIAAExWAgAAfVAD//5PEwA==
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 15:46:36 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE994179E4E@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
References: <CABFReBqqVx9yGrHRd4nrW5mBN1=qQcL370h0Z4u+v-K_+q5cQw@mail.gmail.com> <CBA848A1.B393%luby@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <CBA848A1.B393%luby@qualcomm.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.178.200]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.0.0.4211-6.800.1017-18826.006
x-tm-as-result: No--47.074700-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:46:52 -0000

Well, the draft is informational not PS track. It simply tries to show a few examples for the use of framework.

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luby, Michael
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:12 AM
> To: Greg Shepherd; Colin Perkins
> Cc: fecframe@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
> 
> I started to read it but unfortunately have not yet read it thoroughly.  I
> agree with Colin in the sense that it doesn't seem to be on a standards
> track, it has some information in it that could be useful, if properly
> written (and could be standards track, if it was a lot more precise).  My
> sense was that it has a couple of examples but no real general techniques,
> there is some confusing terminology (or at least overused, same
> terminology used for different purposes), seems to make a lot of implicit
> assumptions that aren't spelled out that would be necessary for the
> particular examples to work,  and overall makes it hard to understand how
> to use this approach in general.  I would suggest a fairly substantial
> rethinking of this one.  Unfortunately, I won't have time to look at this
> again over the next two weeks.
> Mike
> 
> On 4/9/12 6:20 AM, "Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> >Thanks Colin!
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>; wrote:
> >> Greg,
> >>
> >> I read this. It looks okay, and says that the pieces should be combined
> >>in the expected manner. My only real comment would be that it feels more
> >>informational than standards track, but I leave that decision for the WG
> >>chairs.
> >>
> >> Colin
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 Mar 2012, at 18:08, Greg Shepherd wrote:
> >>> Please resound ASAP. WG Consensus requires input from the WG.
> >>>
> >>> Greg
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>; wrote:
> >>>> We're halfway through the two week timer and the list has been silent.
> >>>> We need "consensus" and that requires input from you. A vote of
> >>>> support IS feedback too. Please respond soon so we can progress.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Greg
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>;
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>> This starts a 2 week WGLC for Pseudo Content Delivery Protocol (CDP)
> >>>>> for Protecting Multiple Source Flows in FEC Framework,
> >>>>> draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp-02:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please read and respond to the list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Greg
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Fecframe mailing list
> >>> Fecframe@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Colin Perkins
> >> http://csperkins.org/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Fecframe mailing list
> >Fecframe@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe