Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC

Well, the draft is informational not PS track. It simply tries to show a few examples for the use of framework.

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luby, Michael
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:12 AM
> To: Greg Shepherd; Colin Perkins
> Cc: fecframe@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
> 
> I started to read it but unfortunately have not yet read it thoroughly.  I
> agree with Colin in the sense that it doesn't seem to be on a standards
> track, it has some information in it that could be useful, if properly
> written (and could be standards track, if it was a lot more precise).  My
> sense was that it has a couple of examples but no real general techniques,
> there is some confusing terminology (or at least overused, same
> terminology used for different purposes), seems to make a lot of implicit
> assumptions that aren't spelled out that would be necessary for the
> particular examples to work,  and overall makes it hard to understand how
> to use this approach in general.  I would suggest a fairly substantial
> rethinking of this one.  Unfortunately, I won't have time to look at this
> again over the next two weeks.
> Mike
> 
> On 4/9/12 6:20 AM, "Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >Thanks Colin!
> >
> >On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org> wrote:
> >> Greg,
> >>
> >> I read this. It looks okay, and says that the pieces should be combined
> >>in the expected manner. My only real comment would be that it feels more
> >>informational than standards track, but I leave that decision for the WG
> >>chairs.
> >>
> >> Colin
> >>
> >>
> >> On 22 Mar 2012, at 18:08, Greg Shepherd wrote:
> >>> Please resound ASAP. WG Consensus requires input from the WG.
> >>>
> >>> Greg
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> We're halfway through the two week timer and the list has been silent.
> >>>> We need "consensus" and that requires input from you. A vote of
> >>>> support IS feedback too. Please respond soon so we can progress.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Greg
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>> This starts a 2 week WGLC for Pseudo Content Delivery Protocol (CDP)
> >>>>> for Protecting Multiple Source Flows in FEC Framework,
> >>>>> draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp-02:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please read and respond to the list.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> Greg
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Fecframe mailing list
> >>> Fecframe@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Colin Perkins
> >> http://csperkins.org/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >_______________________________________________
> >Fecframe mailing list
> >Fecframe@ietf.org
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe