Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10

"Luby, Michael" <luby@qualcomm.com> Fri, 20 April 2012 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <luby@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F8F21F8747 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUP9nVDsw7oL for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:29:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DFD21F870B for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:29:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=luby@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1334939382; x=1366475382; h=from:to:cc:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date: message-id:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language: x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:user-agent: x-originating-ip:content-type:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=FNR5cOswN8+ictpEHzt22zc/SFIgLP4FJQweiPh5UP4=; b=P+KNAZsEeZi0GNJ8lTFVLhazjf+lbr0D4bdiB/diAstxTLPsHhtrcUwM 2+DSTF6nLK76IcauTWDc3fZhp2JUc8MarHyvRuTNFdaX0frHpQ0dz/nLS PUoCES2x93Ab1cVIsEsgsdfFluqQh+Fdks3QgOXvakF/TmQ9gHrzc19Um I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6687"; a="181244973"
Received: from ironmsg02-l.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.16]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 20 Apr 2012 09:29:41 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,452,1330934400"; d="scan'208";a="120515167"
Received: from nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.2]) by ironmsg02-L.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 20 Apr 2012 09:29:41 -0700
Received: from NASANEXD02C.na.qualcomm.com ([169.254.4.18]) by nasanexhc05.na.qualcomm.com ([172.30.48.2]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.003; Fri, 20 Apr 2012 09:29:41 -0700
From: "Luby, Michael" <luby@qualcomm.com>
To: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>, "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
Thread-Index: AQHNHvHaFXF64Dm5Gk6ykvXCIAcmLJaj57GA
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:29:40 +0000
Message-ID: <CBB6DB68.BF1A%luby@qualcomm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4F9157AA.8020205@neclab.eu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.0.120402
x-originating-ip: [10.64.11.237]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <E53C0492C2BCAA41B62109763BE5524A@qualcomm.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 16:29:43 -0000

Just for information, only 1711 is relevant, all the others are obsolete.
Also, 1711 exactly mirrors the IPR statements for RFC 5053 and RFC 6330
(these are the original Raptor and RaptorQ specifications for object
delivery developed in RMT).

On 4/20/12 5:33 AM, "Martin Stiemerling" <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>;
wrote:

>Dear all,
>
>The draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10 is scheduled for the upcoming IESG
>telechat on April 26th.
>
>And as your new Area Director I have a question about the WG's view on
>the IPR. There are by today (April 20th) 4 IPR disclosures with respect
>to this draft:
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_documen
>t_tag=draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor
>
>What is the opinion of the WG about those IPR disclosures? Is there any
>disagreement to move the draft forward or are all fine with the current
>state?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>
>   Martin
>
>-- 
>IETF Transport Area Director
>
>martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
>
>NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
>Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
>Registered in England 283
>_______________________________________________
>Fecframe mailing list
>Fecframe@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe