Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10

Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Wed, 25 April 2012 09:48 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611D321F870F for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJc3Zekh67pH for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204A721F85D0 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74920100DF9 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUC+snIZ3amO for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F0E100D73 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:45:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.1.1.190] (10.1.1.190) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:47:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4F97C849.1060004@neclab.eu>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:47:53 +0200
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
References: <CBBC352B.862D8%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBBC352B.862D8%stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.190]
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:48:00 -0000

Ok, thanks for your feedback so far!

This helps for sure in the upcoming IESG discussions.

Thanks,

   Martin

On 04/24/2012 07:47 PM, Stephan Wenger wrote:
> +1
> Stephan
>
> On 4.24.2012 08:15 , "Ali C. Begen (abegen)"<abegen@cisco.com>;  wrote:
>
>> FWIW, I don¹t have a particular problem with this IPR on Raptor drafts.
>> Raptor is used in several places and I don¹t see why not we should
>> document it properly within the FEC framework.
>>
>> -acbegen
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:37 AM
>>> To: fecframe@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on
>>> draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
>>>
>>> There has been no answer to my below question about what the WG's
>>> opinion about the IPR disclosure is.
>>>
>>> I read the silence as 'don not like' the IPR unless the WG speaks up and
>>> tells me the opposite.
>>>
>>> Please note that this draft is on the IESG telechat for this Thursday
>>> (2012-04-26).
>>> I guess the IESG will ask exactly my question and it would be good to
>>> have a response from the WG.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>     Martin -- your responsible Area Director
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/20/2012 02:33 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote:
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> The draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10 is scheduled for the upcoming IESG
>>>> telechat on April 26th.
>>>>
>>>> And as your new Area Director I have a question about the WG's view on
>>>> the IPR. There are by today (April 20th) 4 IPR disclosures with
>>> respect
>>>> to this draft:
>>>>
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_docume
>>> nt_tag=draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is the opinion of the WG about those IPR disclosures? Is there
>>> any
>>>> disagreement to move the draft forward or are all fine with the
>>> current
>>>> state?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> IETF Transport Area Director
>>>
>>> martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
>>>
>>> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
>>> Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
>>> Registered in England 283
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Fecframe mailing list
>>> Fecframe@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
>> _______________________________________________
>> Fecframe mailing list
>> Fecframe@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
>>
>
>

-- 
IETF Transport Area Director

martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL
Registered in England 283