Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Wed, 25 April 2012 09:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611D321F870F for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oJc3Zekh67pH for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204A721F85D0 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 02:47:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74920100DF9 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZUC+snIZ3amO for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:45:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F0E100D73 for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:45:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.1.1.190] (10.1.1.190) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:47:53 +0200
Message-ID: <4F97C849.1060004@neclab.eu>
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:47:53 +0200
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
References: <CBBC352B.862D8%stewe@stewe.org>
In-Reply-To: <CBBC352B.862D8%stewe@stewe.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.190]
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 09:48:00 -0000
Ok, thanks for your feedback so far! This helps for sure in the upcoming IESG discussions. Thanks, Martin On 04/24/2012 07:47 PM, Stephan Wenger wrote: > +1 > Stephan > > On 4.24.2012 08:15 , "Ali C. Begen (abegen)"<abegen@cisco.com> wrote: > >> FWIW, I don¹t have a particular problem with this IPR on Raptor drafts. >> Raptor is used in several places and I don¹t see why not we should >> document it properly within the FEC framework. >> >> -acbegen >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On >>> Behalf Of Martin Stiemerling >>> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 9:37 AM >>> To: fecframe@ietf.org >>> Subject: Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on >>> draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10 >>> >>> There has been no answer to my below question about what the WG's >>> opinion about the IPR disclosure is. >>> >>> I read the silence as 'don not like' the IPR unless the WG speaks up and >>> tells me the opposite. >>> >>> Please note that this draft is on the IESG telechat for this Thursday >>> (2012-04-26). >>> I guess the IESG will ask exactly my question and it would be good to >>> have a response from the WG. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> Martin -- your responsible Area Director >>> >>> >>> On 04/20/2012 02:33 PM, Martin Stiemerling wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> The draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor-10 is scheduled for the upcoming IESG >>>> telechat on April 26th. >>>> >>>> And as your new Area Director I have a question about the WG's view on >>>> the IPR. There are by today (April 20th) 4 IPR disclosures with >>> respect >>>> to this draft: >>>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?option=document_search&id_docume >>> nt_tag=draft-ietf-fecframe-raptor >>>> >>>> >>>> What is the opinion of the WG about those IPR disclosures? Is there >>> any >>>> disagreement to move the draft forward or are all fine with the >>> current >>>> state? >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance, >>>> >>>> Martin >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> IETF Transport Area Director >>> >>> martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu >>> >>> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited >>> Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL >>> Registered in England 283 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Fecframe mailing list >>> Fecframe@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe >> _______________________________________________ >> Fecframe mailing list >> Fecframe@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe >> > > -- IETF Transport Area Director martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division NEC Europe Limited Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL Registered in England 283
- [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ietf-f… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Luby, Michael
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Luby, Michael
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Stephan Wenger
- Re: [Fecframe] AD question about IPRs on draft-ie… Martin Stiemerling