Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC

"Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com> Mon, 30 April 2012 17:01 UTC

Return-Path: <abegen@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1833421F87A8 for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:01:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dYBP2S1CjbtB for <fecframe@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1382321F876C for <fecframe@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 10:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=abegen@cisco.com; l=4043; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1335805279; x=1337014879; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=PA+YINK+6Ou2GZGUOMtrB3acolt95XH74wmppL5QvYo=; b=VBL5FXrva/If5V5cauzbrbvRSPuITva0Rd/Xm/E7aX7KoYLMe3gCHwEc R2ZV5WaktbA5IjW5hANRTcW532GU5Z5meedgC4Ojl8l2tNsYxU4LY7qtB BwinQdn5KOkn29Hoq9PFvPIy/CtrG9cZmvXXomFXTjQfNRLwZ60ospGke g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgEFALbEnk+tJXG9/2dsb2JhbABEr06DAIEHggkBAQEEAQEBDwFbCwwEAgEIDgMEAQEBCh0HIQYLFAkIAgQOBQgah10DCwEKmhmWGQ2JU4oMhjNjBJcPii6DGoFpgmg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,505,1330905600"; d="scan'208";a="79125481"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Apr 2012 17:01:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q3UH1IIp012378; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:01:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com ([fe80::747b:83e1:9755:d453]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 12:01:18 -0500
From: "Ali C. Begen (abegen)" <abegen@cisco.com>
To: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
Thread-Index: AQHM9Y5oYUTwcglnikao6K4vFs4/VpZchu8AgBqw5ACAG+ZYgIAAExWAgAAfVAD//5PEwIAhFdQg
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:01:17 +0000
Message-ID: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE994B7DBE3@xmb-aln-x01.cisco.com>
References: <CABFReBqqVx9yGrHRd4nrW5mBN1=qQcL370h0Z4u+v-K_+q5cQw@mail.gmail.com> <CBA848A1.B393%luby@qualcomm.com> <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE994179E4E@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <C15918F2FCDA0243A7C919DA7C4BE994179E4E@xmb-rcd-x01-p.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.178.200]
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-6.800.1017-18874.006
x-tm-as-result: No--55.303500-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "fecframe@ietf.org" <fecframe@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
X-BeenThere: fecframe@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of FEC Framework <fecframe.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/fecframe>
List-Post: <mailto:fecframe@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe>, <mailto:fecframe-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 17:01:20 -0000

The current draft will expire soon. Is the WGLC ended? Can I submit a refresh?

-acbegen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ali C. Begen (abegen)
> Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:47 AM
> To: Luby, Michael; Greg Shepherd; Colin Perkins
> Cc: fecframe@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
> 
> Well, the draft is informational not PS track. It simply tries to show a few examples for the use of framework.
> 
> -acbegen
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fecframe-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:fecframe-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Luby, Michael
> > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2012 11:12 AM
> > To: Greg Shepherd; Colin Perkins
> > Cc: fecframe@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Fecframe] draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp WGLC
> >
> > I started to read it but unfortunately have not yet read it thoroughly.  I
> > agree with Colin in the sense that it doesn't seem to be on a standards
> > track, it has some information in it that could be useful, if properly
> > written (and could be standards track, if it was a lot more precise).  My
> > sense was that it has a couple of examples but no real general techniques,
> > there is some confusing terminology (or at least overused, same
> > terminology used for different purposes), seems to make a lot of implicit
> > assumptions that aren't spelled out that would be necessary for the
> > particular examples to work,  and overall makes it hard to understand how
> > to use this approach in general.  I would suggest a fairly substantial
> > rethinking of this one.  Unfortunately, I won't have time to look at this
> > again over the next two weeks.
> > Mike
> >
> > On 4/9/12 6:20 AM, "Greg Shepherd" <gjshep@gmail.com>; wrote:
> >
> > >Thanks Colin!
> > >
> > >On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 5:12 AM, Colin Perkins <csp@csperkins.org>; wrote:
> > >> Greg,
> > >>
> > >> I read this. It looks okay, and says that the pieces should be combined
> > >>in the expected manner. My only real comment would be that it feels more
> > >>informational than standards track, but I leave that decision for the WG
> > >>chairs.
> > >>
> > >> Colin
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 22 Mar 2012, at 18:08, Greg Shepherd wrote:
> > >>> Please resound ASAP. WG Consensus requires input from the WG.
> > >>>
> > >>> Greg
> > >>>
> > >>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>; wrote:
> > >>>> We're halfway through the two week timer and the list has been silent.
> > >>>> We need "consensus" and that requires input from you. A vote of
> > >>>> support IS feedback too. Please respond soon so we can progress.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Greg
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>;
> > >>>>wrote:
> > >>>>> This starts a 2 week WGLC for Pseudo Content Delivery Protocol (CDP)
> > >>>>> for Protecting Multiple Source Flows in FEC Framework,
> > >>>>> draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp-02:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-fecframe-pseudo-cdp/
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please read and respond to the list.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>> Greg
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> Fecframe mailing list
> > >>> Fecframe@ietf.org
> > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Colin Perkins
> > >> http://csperkins.org/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >Fecframe mailing list
> > >Fecframe@ietf.org
> > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fecframe mailing list
> > Fecframe@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe
> _______________________________________________
> Fecframe mailing list
> Fecframe@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/fecframe