[Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL path to RSS feeds?
Mark <mark@openrss.org> Thu, 26 December 2024 07:26 UTC
Return-Path: <mark@openrss.org>
X-Original-To: feeds@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: feeds@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3C8C14F6AB for <feeds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 23:26:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=openrss.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Aiq9iNgfochi for <feeds@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 23:26:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-4323.proton.ch (mail-4323.proton.ch [185.70.43.23]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3388C14F600 for <feeds@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Dec 2024 23:26:38 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=openrss.org; s=protonmail2; t=1735197995; x=1735457195; bh=Rz3KsyKCE4NN30lSjF7U/X40+qOYsPjlQYc3PJOZXRc=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: Feedback-ID:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID:BIMI-Selector:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post; b=IECcYKvq2JSIk3/FjFQNQA2mlBSEtapceopDO0gu0CMF2zby0Or6x5Ryf1eiPR6JE 4Jb046L/Il1lp3ZA+hqX2IPVDEh+kIqaqNwo+G3KvFA3Yopyoajg9Lhmea0WIXsLL6 WjtBXwAtEZ7qHO7eSK13zbXu2Gta/nqvNIJufgJ2SC/pnkiA7Y1olmoZ6pKDXsQXNZ 3x7w/Hr1e6ERwe0N8wu60sz8gKAqCOLuR9hM6JXoOBFM7DaHIKr6pQN92cYoPyG35/ KIwcJb0ypz2DAjZtrxiQuHPd/veVndZ/blxpSzhB0IhJG73zGFfpC7IAgUrcDhuC9M okG6D5qRiEMpA==
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2024 07:26:31 +0000
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
From: Mark <mark@openrss.org>
Message-ID: <2ix0pHQfu_AImelI95ViwjKRYYLDBc5uRAUG5SybgGdNX9DO_LsSLJOvpgdEGGw5ox3t0swhsEm5YRQpPM0znpJ2zHeigbvGzuQDsr0UXho=@openrss.org>
In-Reply-To: <bd248ea3-d480-495b-9b74-bfb5194553a0@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
References: <CAChr6SyzxzXeFkhLUh0UKHmh_8Fky9ZdhJt8st74SJcqtQZaUA@mail.gmail.com> <bd248ea3-d480-495b-9b74-bfb5194553a0@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Feedback-ID: 62933185:user:proton
X-Pm-Message-ID: 07aa2df9c7ae2902a3a67594753b1ecdfb181c73
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID-Hash: J7IBIIMJUBYU664FJUWZIKI6EUKQIKJB
X-Message-ID-Hash: J7IBIIMJUBYU664FJUWZIKI6EUKQIKJB
X-MailFrom: mark@openrss.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: feeds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL path to RSS feeds?
List-Id: Web Feeds <feeds.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/feeds/t8Q0MfXj9lRQVV5iCYeZsPNyAKY>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/feeds>
List-Help: <mailto:feeds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:feeds-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:feeds@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:feeds-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:feeds-leave@ietf.org>
Hey Martin, Thanks for the link. I've taken a look at that and it says "specifications for applications that use HTTP won't contain fixed application URLs or paths; while it is common practice [...], doing so in an IETF specification is inappropriate". This suggests that my original question around a standard and fixed URL path for RSS feeds would be inappropriate for the IETF. However, it contradicts something like section 2.3 of RFC 9309 (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9309.html#name-access-method) where a fixed URL path is clearly being used for a "robots.txt" file. Please correct me if I'm misunderstanding, but why is having a fixed URL path for something like "robots.txt" acceptable for the IETF, but not for a fixed URL path for RSS feeds? Thanks for any clarification. Mark Kennedy Engineer openrss.org On Thursday, December 26th, 2024 at 1:36 AM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote: > Sorry for being so late, but when cleaning up my inbox, I found this and > thought that for some people, a look at RFC 9205 (BCP 56), in particular > Section 4.4 > (https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9205#name-specifying-urls) might > provide some additional background. > > Regards, Martin. > > On 2024-12-18 06:41, Rob Sayre wrote: > > > Oh, it's so much worse than you think. :) > > > > Check this one out: > > > > https://help.apple.com/itc/podcasts_connect/#/itcb54353390 > > > > Look at "itunes:new-feed-url" there. Apologies in advance, it's like > > nails on a chalkboard. > > > > thanks, > > Rob > > > -- > Feeds mailing list -- feeds@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to feeds-leave@ietf.org
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… tim rice
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Mark
- [Feeds] Should we standardize on a single URL pat… Mark
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Teotime Pacreau
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Mark
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Damon Hart-Davis
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… John Levine
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Dan Wing
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Rob Sayre
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Steve
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Martin J. Dürst
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Mark
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Martin J. Dürst
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Mark
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Martin J. Dürst
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Jens Oliver Meiert
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Martin J. Dürst
- [Feeds] Re: Should we standardize on a single URL… Jens Oliver Meiert