Re: Last Call: The Architecture of the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP) to Proposed Standard

hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov (Ted Hardie) Mon, 02 March 1998 16:37 UTC

Delivery-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 11:37:59 -0500
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 08:37:54 -0800
From: hardie@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov
Message-Id: <9803020837.ZM25149@thornhill.arc.nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ns.ietf.org> "Last Call: The Architecture of the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP) to Proposed Standard" (Feb 27, 9:53am)
References: <199802271453.JAA09112@ns.ietf.org>
Reply-To: hardie@nic.nasa.gov
To: iesg@ns.ietf.org
Subject: Re: Last Call: The Architecture of the Common Indexing Protocol (CIP) to Proposed Standard
Cc: find@Bunyip.Com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

In the last call notice, draft-ietf-find-soif-registry-00.txt was
listed as being considered for experimental.  What happens, then,
with the creation of the registry?  If an "experimental" registry
is created, I have severe doubts about its usefulness.  If the
registry will be created and maintained, I am confused about the
experimental designation.

I realize that the IANA considerations documents (and who knows
how much mailing list traffic on IANA and its successors) has come
out since this document was written; if it needs to be re-written
to conform, I would be happy to do so.

			regards,
				Ted Hardie
				NASA NIC

Last Call: The Architecture of the Common Indexin… The IESG
Re: Last Call: The Architecture of the Common Ind… Ted Hardie