Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE LFB (draft sections) to review.
Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com> Sat, 23 October 2004 19:03 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA15420 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:03:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLROE-0002Cz-Gk for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:17:22 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLR4x-00056s-0x; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:57:27 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLR2G-0004Ql-MX for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:54:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA14939 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:54:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from e4.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.104]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLRFM-00025h-2I for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 15:08:12 -0400
Received: from d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (d01relay02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.234]) by e4.ny.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i9NIrsCE482876; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:53:54 -0400
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (d01av02.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.216]) by d01relay02.pok.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id i9NIrr0v289814; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:53:53 -0400
Received: from [9.4.69.18] (dhcp69-18.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.69.18]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA82238; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:53:52 +0200
Message-ID: <417AA8B6.1040601@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 20:53:42 +0200
From: Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM Research Lab
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE LFB (draft sections) to review.
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579210@orsmsx408><1E526654-24BF-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com> <417A23E6.7010504@zurich.ibm.com> <005b01c4b907$242b1790$020aa8c0@wwm1>
In-Reply-To: <005b01c4b907$242b1790$020aa8c0@wwm1>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by e4.ny.us.ibm.com id i9NIrsCE482876
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 2e8fc473f5174be667965460bd5288ba
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, avri@psg.com, hadi@znyx.com, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7e439b86d3292ef5adf93b694a43a576
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
All, Attached is the text updated according to Weiming's comments. Regards, -Robert ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- We can remove sections 3.3.2 and 3.3.3, and replace them with a single section that provides an overview of what these "special LFBs": New section 3.3.2: Whereas four key PL messages have a specific type assigned (Association Setup, Response, and Teardown, as well as Heartbeat) mostly for simplicity and monitoring reasons, all other PL messages follow the LFB structure as this provides more flexibility for future enhancements. In addition, this shows how the ForCES protocol itself can be controlled by the very same type of structures (LFBs) as it uses to control functions such as IP forwarding, filtering, etc. To achieve this, the following LFBs are used: FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, and CE LFB. These LFBs are detailed in Section XXX. An short description is provided here: The FE Protocol LFB is a logical entity in each FE that is used to control the ForCES protocol. The CE operates on this LFB to subscribe or unsubscribe to Heartbeat messages, define the Heartbeat interval, or discover which ForCES protocol version and which TMLs the FE supports. The FE Protocol LFB also contains the various ForCES ID to be used: unicast IDs and table of the PL multicast IDs the FE must be listening to. [TBD: I don't think we need a CE Protocol LFB] The FE LFB (referred to as "FE attributes" in the model draft) should not be confused with the FE Protocol Object. The FE LFB is a logical entity in each FE and contains attributes relative to the FE itself, and not to the operation of the ForCES protocol between the CE and the FE. Such attributes can be FEState (refer to model draft), vendor, etc. The FE LFB contains in particular an table that maps a virtual LFB Instance ID to one or more Instance IDs of LFBs in the FE. The CE LFB is the counterpart of the FE LFB. The CE LFB is a logical entity in each CE and contains attributes relative to the CE itself, and not to the operation of the ForCES protocol between the CE and the FE. This LFB can be used to convey event notifications from a CE to FEs. Some events may be sent by the CE without prior subscription by the FEs. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The following section should be inserted just before the "Protocol Messages" section. It provides the detail (in english, not xml) of the LFBs. Chapter X: FE, CE, and Protocol LFBs. The FE LFB, CE LFB, and FE Protocol LFB are used to control the operation of the ForCES protocol and interact with FEs and CEs. Although these LFBs have the same form and interface as other LFBs, they are special in many respects: they have fixed well-known LFB Class and Instance IDs. They are statically defined (no dynamic instantiation allowed) and their status cannot be changed by the protocol: any operation to change the state of such LFBs (for instance, in order to disable the LFB) must result in an error. Moreover, these LFBs must exist before the first ForCES message can be sent or received. All attributes in these LFBs must have pre-defined default values. Finally, these LFBs do not have input nor output ports and do not integrate into the intra-FE LFB topology. Section X.1 FE Protocol LFB The FE Protocol LFB is a logical entity in each FE that is used to control the ForCES protocol. The FE Protocol LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x1. The FE LFB Instance ID is assigned the value 0x1. There must always be one and only one instance of the FE Protocol LFB in an FE. The values of the attributes in the FE Protocol LFB have pre-defined default values that are specified here. Unless explicit changes are made to these values using Config messages from the CE, these default values MUST be used for the operation of the protocol. The FE Protocol Object consists of the following elements: FE Protocol events that can be subscribed/unsubscribed: FE heartbeat FE TML events (TBD) FE Protocol capabilities (read-only): Supported ForCES protocol version(s) by the FE Supported ForCES FE model(s) by the FE Some TML capability description(s) FE Protocol attributes (can be read and set): Current version of the ForCES protocol Current version of the FE model FE unicast ID FE multicast ID(s) (list) Association Expiry Timer Heartbeat Interval Primary CE FE failover and restart policy CE failover and restart policy [XXX: what is the diff with FE failover ?] [TBD: define default values for each attribute if applicable] Section X.2 The FE LFB is a logical entity in each FE and contains attributes relative to the FE itself, and not to the operation of the ForCES protocol. The FE LFB Class ID is assigned the value 0x2. The FE LFB Instance ID is assigned the value 0x1. There must always be one and only one instance of the FE LFB in an FE. The FE LFB consists of the following elements: FE Events: FEAllEvents (subscribing to this corresponds to subscribing to all events below) FEStatusChange (events that signal FE Up/Down/Active/Inactive/Failover) FE DoS alert FE capability change FE attributes: FEStatusChange (to set the FE in Active, Inactive, or Shutdown mode [Note: this replaces the State Maintenance messages]) MIID table (a list of virtual LFB Instance IDs that map to a list of Instance IDs of LFBs in that FE [Refer to Zsolt's note]) FE Behavior Exp. Timer HA Mode FE DoS protection policy [the attributes below were previously under Query message] Inter-FE topology Intra-FE topology Section X.3 The CE LFB is a logical entity in each CE and contains attributes relative to the CE itself, and not to the operation of the ForCES protocol. The CE LFB consists of the following elements: CE Events: CEAllEvents (subscribing to this corresponds to subscribing to all events below) [Do we want to allow an FE to explicitely subscribe to CE events ?] CEStatusChange (events that signal CE Up/Down/Active/Inactive/Failover) [Such events do not necessarily need to be subscribed to, they can fire even without subscription and inform the FE] [TBD: what else do we need in the CE LFB ?] -- Robert Haas IBM Zurich Research Laboratory Säumerstrasse 4 CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland phone +41-1-724-8698 fax +41-1-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha _______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Header Section Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Header Section Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Header Section avri
- RE: [Forces-protocol] Header Section Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Header Section avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Header Section Wang,Weiming
- [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE LFB… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] querry message (path vs attribu… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Header Section Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB,CE … Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] 01-5 avri
- [Forces-protocol] Feedback section 6.1. Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.2 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.3 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.5 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Feedback on rest of section 6 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Re: querry message (path vs att… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] FE Protocol LFB, FE LFB, CE… Wang,Weiming
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-5 Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.5 Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: querry message (path vs… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback on section 6.5 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-5 avri
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-5 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-5 avri
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-5 Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: querry message (path vs… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: querry message (path vs… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] 01-7 avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Feedback: Section 6.4 Joel M. Halpern
- [Forces-protocol] Resend: Feedback: Section 6.2 Jamal Hadi Salim