IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com> Sat, 16 October 2004 00:25 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08936 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:25:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIcZe-0001YJ-14 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:37:30 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CIcMG-00082r-MC; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:23:40 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CIcK1-0006pN-E2 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:21:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA08489 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:21:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from znx208-2-156-007.znyx.com ([208.2.156.7] helo=lotus.znyx.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CIcVU-0001SM-MU for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:33:12 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([208.2.156.2]) by lotus.znyx.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with ESMTP id 2004101517235624:29772 ; Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:23:56 -0700
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@MEGISTO.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20041015201212.02416bf0@mail.megisto.com>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02E60C6D@orsmsx408> <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02E60C6D@orsmsx408> <5.1.0.14.0.20041015201212.02416bf0@mail.megisto.com>
Organization: ZNYX Networks
Message-Id: <1097886077.1043.15.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 20:21:17 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/15/2004 05:23:56 PM, Serialize by Router on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/15/2004 05:23:57 PM, Serialize complete at 10/15/2004 05:23:57 PM
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 68c8cc8a64a9d0402e43b8eee9fc4199
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, zsolt@petri-meat.com, "Yang, Lily L" <lily.l.yang@intel.com>, Steve Blake <slblake@petri-meat.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, Alan DeKok <alan.dekok@idt.com>, Ellen M Deleganes <ellen.m.deleganes@intel.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@znyx.com
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 20:12, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> I personally prefer that the message type be independent of the operation 
> type.  Thus if we create conditional gets, or test and set, or any other 
> interesting operations we don't have to discuss whether ti goes in the GET 
> message or the SET message.

Can you be more specific in the case of the config/set vs query
examples? Thats whats on our immediate plate

cheers,
jamal


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email