Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the optionsforLFB-level multicast]

Ok, I'l send you a slide or two for this by today or tomorrow.

Thanks,
Weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>

> Weiming,
>
> I will do this.
> Can you send me a slide or two on your idea of path - I just wanna make
> sure i dont misrepresent it.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 08:59, Weiming Wang wrote:
> > Hi Jamal,
> >
> > I hope the discussion on the path can be summarized your the presentation.
> > Obviously it is an important issue, actually I think the issue spent most of
our
> > time discussing on since last IETF meeting.
> >
> > Another is I hope you can add a few words on the LFB multicast when you talk
> > about the protocol grammar where LFB addressign format is included, so as to
be
> > consistent with Robert's presentation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Weiming
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
> > > Robert,
> > > I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to work
> > > on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> > > Heres a start that i will refine later.
> > > I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> > > views of "path" - I will still do that if theres
> > > a) view i should  or b) time allows it
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > jamal
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forces-protocol mailing list
> Forces-protocol@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
>

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol