Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the optionsforLFB-level multicast]

"Weiming Wang" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Sun, 07 November 2004 01:59 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA25896 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:59:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQcLm-0003uO-05 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 21:00:14 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQcJk-00012x-EW; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 20:58:08 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQcGS-0000cO-7M for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 20:54:44 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA25627 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 20:54:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQcG8-0003oL-2p for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 20:54:59 -0500
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 58110.341813895; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 10:16:07 +0800 (CST)
Received: from wwm1 (unverified [219.82.164.90]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000103335@mail.gsu.cn>; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:56:23 +0800
Message-ID: <003201c4c46d$1bbce4a0$020aa8c0@wwm1>
From: "Weiming Wang" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>
References: <4189F776.4080306@zurich.ibm.com><1099700691.1038.2.camel@jzny.localdomain><005101c4c408$dc341600$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1099752095.1037.11.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the optionsforLFB-level multicast]
Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 09:57:13 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 5a9a1bd6c2d06a21d748b7d0070ddcb8
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, "\(Ram Gopal \)" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, Dong Ligang <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 082a9cbf4d599f360ac7f815372a6a15

Ok, I'l send you a slide or two for this by today or tomorrow.

Thanks,
Weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>

> Weiming,
>
> I will do this.
> Can you send me a slide or two on your idea of path - I just wanna make
> sure i dont misrepresent it.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
> On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 08:59, Weiming Wang wrote:
> > Hi Jamal,
> >
> > I hope the discussion on the path can be summarized your the presentation.
> > Obviously it is an important issue, actually I think the issue spent most of
our
> > time discussing on since last IETF meeting.
> >
> > Another is I hope you can add a few words on the LFB multicast when you talk
> > about the protocol grammar where LFB addressign format is included, so as to
be
> > consistent with Robert's presentation.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Weiming
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
> > > Robert,
> > > I saw your presentation. Looks fine. Apologies, havent had time to work
> > > on the protocol one. I am trying not to have too many slides.
> > > Heres a start that i will refine later.
> > > I was trying to build upto a point where i could explain the different
> > > views of "path" - I will still do that if theres
> > > a) view i should  or b) time allows it
> > >
> > > cheers,
> > > jamal
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forces-protocol mailing list
> Forces-protocol@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
>



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol