Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com> Tue, 26 October 2004 11:22 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA25040 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:22:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMPdG-0000kd-Ul for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:36:55 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMPLl-0006Ng-Td; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:18:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMPKc-0005x4-DY for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:17:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA24325 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:17:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from znx208-2-156-007.znyx.com ([208.2.156.7] helo=lotus.znyx.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMPYG-0000cS-CO for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 07:31:44 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([208.2.156.2]) by lotus.znyx.com (Lotus Domino Release 5.0.11) with ESMTP id 2004102604200482:42138 ; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 04:20:04 -0700
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>
To: Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
In-Reply-To: <002001c4bafa$df86cbc0$8401a8c0@dlg>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E025791E5@orsmsx408> <002d01c4b50b$1ecc9c10$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1098102734.1042.134.camel@jzny.localdomain> <013101c4b51d$a50761e0$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1098134060.1077.446.camel@jzny.localdomain> <5.1.0.14.0.20041019093826.0232d418@mail.megisto.com> <055401c4b669$97a1c840$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <1098383190.2883.386.camel@localhost.localdomain> <00dd01c4b803$806bd620$8401a8c0@dlg> <1098442868.1112.38.camel@jzny.localdomain> <00c601c4ba72$241599d0$8401a8c0@dlg> <1098722995.1034.67.camel@jzny.localdomain> <417D61D4.6000909@zurich.ibm.com> <002001c4bafa$df86cbc0$8401a8c0@dlg>
Organization: ZNYX Networks
Message-Id: <1098789452.1044.57.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2
Date: 26 Oct 2004 07:17:33 -0400
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/26/2004 04:20:05 AM, Serialize by Router on Lotus/Znyx(Release 5.0.11 |July 24, 2002) at 10/26/2004 04:20:07 AM
X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, ram.gopal@nokia.com, "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@megisto.com>, Zsolt Haraszti <zsolt@modularnet.com>, "Steven Blake \(petri-meat\)" <slblake@petri-meat.com>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, "Wang, Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: hadi@znyx.com
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0566263264=="
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 2.2 (++)
X-Scan-Signature: 7aafa0432175920a4b3e118e16c5cb64


I concur with Ligang. Robert if you can ask for a slot, I think this
issue needs to be resolved.

cheers,
jamal

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 21:26, Ligang Dong wrote:
> hi, 
> Jamal, thank you for the summarization about this issue.
> Robert, thank you for the presentation about this issue. 
> We have the same objective of making the protocol simple and efficient.
> best regards
> Ligang
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Robert Haas" <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
> To: <hadi@znyx.com>
> Cc: "Ligang Dong" <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>cn>; "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>om>; <ram.gopal@nokia.com>om>; "Steven Blake (petri-meat)" <slblake@petri-meat.com>om>; "Zsolt Haraszti" <zsolt@modularnet.com>om>; "Joel M. Halpern" <jhalpern@megisto.com>om>; <forces-protocol@ietf.org>rg>; "Wang, Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 4:28 AM
> Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?
> 
> 
> > Jamal,
> > 
> > Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > 
> > >I realized after i responded to you that the approach you posted is
> > >slightly different, but end goals the same. So far i think there are
> > >three approaches being talked about.
> > >1) Yours
> > >2) Steve/Robert with MIID (whcih unfortunately made it into the draft
> > >before consensus was reached)
> > >  
> > >
> > Sorry, that was not my intent. My understanding was that there was no 
> > other proposal addressing this issue in particular.
> > 
> > >3) What i posted 
> > >  
> > >
> > I must have missed that.
> > 
> > >Maybe someone needs to present at the meeting.
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > Definitely. A short presentation summarizing all the options. I could 
> > take care of that (probably need 30 min with the discussion).
> > 
> > -- 
> > Robert Haas
> > IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
> > Säumerstrasse 4
> > CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland
> > phone +41-1-724-8698  fax +41-1-724-8578  http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha
> > 

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol