[Forces-protocol] RE: Feedback on section 6.3

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Sat, 23 October 2004 21:23 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23404 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:23:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLTZh-0004WH-DC for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:37:21 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLTLd-0000Nv-1U; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:22:49 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLTL1-0000G6-Ip for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:22:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23281 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:22:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmr12.intel.com ([134.134.136.15] helo=orsfmr001.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLTY8-0004Ul-4l for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 17:35:44 -0400
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.6]) by orsfmr001.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i9NLMIY5000376; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:22:18 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.206]) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i9NLPGfU016995; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 21:25:18 GMT
Received: from orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.56]) by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004102314213731500 ; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:21:37 -0700
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.52]) by orsmsx331.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:21:37 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 14:21:26 -0700
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579214@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: Feedback on section 6.3
Thread-Index: AcS5QAsAX0qkSGFIQsaswILUFnWiNwABgzcw
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>, <avri@psg.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2004 21:21:37.0920 (UTC) FILETIME=[47F36800:01C4B946]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0ddefe323dd869ab027dbfff7eff0465
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: [Forces-protocol] RE: Feedback on section 6.3
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 3e15cc4fdc61d7bce84032741d11c8e5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Jamal,

I'll respond to your comments by end of today (within next 12 hrs)
Avri, pls don't make any changes before that,

Thanks
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] 
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:37 PM
To: avri@psg.com
Cc: Khosravi, Hormuzd M; ram.gopal@nokia.com; Ligang Dong;
forces-protocol@ietf.org; Weiming Wang; Robert Haas
Subject: Feedback on section 6.3


section 6.3

And in general i hope those are seen as sample layouts of the message;
i.e hopefully, nobody sees that layout as the way they must build the
message with an ADD and a DEL etc.

- 6.3.1  Config Message

+ "Config data"   should be "Config data and path"

+ Type is bad to describe operations. That should be operations

+ UPDATE/REPLACE, DEL ALL are really flag extensions which will become
clear once we have path-data noise cleared. Suggest you remove.

+ What is PACKET SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE?

- 6.3.2  Config Response Message

Why do we have " Operation Result "
As far as i can see it is sufficient to look at the Main header type,
a operation, path and its associated data.
Unless this is meant to be a less verbose result?

+ BTW, what is the point of mentioning "single or Array LFB
       specific result entries" or result might be TLV. Just say the 
presentation of the data is stuill under discussion.



cheers,
jamal


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol