[Forces-protocol] RE: Feedback on section 6.3

Jamal,

I'll respond to your comments by end of today (within next 12 hrs)
Avri, pls don't make any changes before that,

Thanks
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: Jamal Hadi Salim [mailto:hadi@znyx.com] 
Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 1:37 PM
To: avri@psg.com
Cc: Khosravi, Hormuzd M; ram.gopal@nokia.com; Ligang Dong;
forces-protocol@ietf.org; Weiming Wang; Robert Haas
Subject: Feedback on section 6.3

section 6.3

And in general i hope those are seen as sample layouts of the message;
i.e hopefully, nobody sees that layout as the way they must build the
message with an ADD and a DEL etc.

- 6.3.1  Config Message

+ "Config data"   should be "Config data and path"

+ Type is bad to describe operations. That should be operations

+ UPDATE/REPLACE, DEL ALL are really flag extensions which will become
clear once we have path-data noise cleared. Suggest you remove.

+ What is PACKET SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE?

- 6.3.2  Config Response Message

Why do we have " Operation Result "
As far as i can see it is sufficient to look at the Main header type,
a operation, path and its associated data.
Unless this is meant to be a less verbose result?

+ BTW, what is the point of mentioning "single or Array LFB
       specific result entries" or result might be TLV. Just say the 
presentation of the data is stuill under discussion.

cheers,
jamal

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol