Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Fri, 12 November 2004 14:54 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA08197 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:54:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CScqJ-0001rE-O1 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:56:04 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CScen-0002Zl-5a; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:44:09 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CScb0-0001gS-Jb for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:40:14 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA07138 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:40:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: from host50.foretec.com ([65.246.255.50] helo=mx2.foretec.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CSccK-0001Vx-RS for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:41:41 -0500
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by mx2.foretec.com with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CScav-0000vV-U2 for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:40:10 -0500
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 58110.341813895; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 23:03:54 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000110551@mail.gsu.cn>; Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:38:43 +0800
Message-ID: <156501c4c8c5$1fb19220$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: <hadi@znyx.com>
References: <4189F776.4080306@zurich.ibm.com> <1099700691.1038.2.camel@jzny.localdomain> <005101c4c408$dc341600$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1099752095.1037.11.camel@jzny.localdomain> <003201c4c46d$1bbce4a0$020aa8c0@wwm1> <004201c4c4ec$61d34c20$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1099829057.2165.18.camel@jzny.localdomain> <00bd01c4c536$fb418ee0$020aa8c0@wwm1> <1099885892.2167.13.camel@jzny.localdomain> <132001c4c551$86023150$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <1099911200.2169.29.camel@jzny.localdomain> <134f01c4c585$216584c0$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <4191299F.4020809@zurich.ibm.com> <142a01c4c6d6$13569980$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <1100100893.2210.24.camel@jzny.localdomain> <14fc01c4c79f$75231f20$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <6.1.2.0.0.20041111091015.03bafec0@localhost> <155001c4c8c0$5eb73ec0$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn> <1100269665.1106.30.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level multicast]
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 22:37:22 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, "\(Ram Gopal \)" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>, forces-protocol@ietf.org, "Joel M. Halpern" <joel@stevecrocker.com>, Patrick Droz <dro@zurich.ibm.com>, David.Putzolu@intel.com, Dong Ligang <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352

Jamal,

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options forLFB-level
multicast]


> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 09:03, Wang,Weiming wrote:
> > Joel,
> >
> > One more thing is, for index based searching, after some operation such as
add,
> > delete and modify, the table actually will also become a random table rather
> > than a linear one regarding the index.
>
> This is not the case as has been discussed so far (in the document
> posted by Steve/Zsolt as well as followup by me).
> Index can be specified by the operation.
> In the case index is not specified, the next available one is used.
> How this is achieved or rules is discussed in those two documents.
I just see random index is unavoidable regardless of rules used.
>
> I am sorry cant participate in the rest of the discussion because i
> still dont see the differences. I would suggest we put a time limit to
> this discussion so we can move to the big one which is data encoding.
> Shall we say two weeks from now as the deadline?
>
> Or maybe i should start the discussion on encoding in parallel?
That's fine.

Cheers,
Weiming
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol