IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Forces-protocol] protocol draft editing?

"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Wed, 20 October 2004 09:24 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA13695 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:24:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CKCuX-0003ew-Lj for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 05:37:39 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CK9JD-0003mc-55; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 01:46:51 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CK6LJ-0007Cx-C0 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:36:49 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA18369 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:36:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CK6WV-0003uP-Ez for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:49:28 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:53:43 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000081784@mail.gsu.cn>; Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:30:32 +0800
Message-ID: <050c01c4b64d$12c9f960$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: hadi@znyx.com, forces-protocol@ietf.org, "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
References: <1098198457.1032.1.camel@jzny.localdomain>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] protocol draft editing?
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 10:32:39 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0bc60ec82efc80c84b8d02f4b0e4de22
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: b19722fc8d3865b147c75ae2495625f2

That's the point.
One followed point is the BNF or bitmap. I'm ok with both. What's your idea,
Hormuzd and other guys?

weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>
To: <forces-protocol@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 11:07 PM
Subject: [Forces-protocol] protocol draft editing?


>
> Now that we seem to have made progress on the basics..
> Avri,
> Could you post a URL to the xml docs that we could start editing?
> We could start with the TODO action items as posted by Hormuzd.
>
> cheers,
> jamal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forces-protocol mailing list
> Forces-protocol@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email