Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8

avri@psg.com Fri, 29 October 2004 22:22 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA21214 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:22:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNfNR-0004Fz-J3 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:37:45 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNet0-0001CH-62; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:06:18 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CNegT-00084p-G4 for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:53:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA17932 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 17:53:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: avri@psg.com
Received: from tla.crepundia.net ([194.71.127.149] helo=report.tla-group.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CNeuo-0003g7-VB for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 18:08:12 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (report.tla-group.com [194.71.127.149]) by report.tla-group.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i9TLRwep010948; Fri, 29 Oct 2004 23:27:59 +0200
In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E030E6FA5@orsmsx408>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E030E6FA5@orsmsx408>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <EED853F9-29F4-11D9-BF46-000393CC2112@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 16:53:14 -0500
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 82c9bddb247d9ba4471160a9a865a5f3
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, "Ram Gopal <ram.gopal@nokia.com>Ligang Dong" <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 02ec665d00de228c50c93ed6b5e4fc1a
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 27 okt 2004, at 18.10, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:

> Avri,
>
> Sorry to bother you via email, but since I wont be coming for the IETF,
> I thought this might be the best way. My reply below..

no bother, my life is spent in email.  well almost.

Anyway, i will see what i can do about it.  At the worst, I will hand 
edit on the final submission - when we get there.

>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com]
>
>> This is fine for now but I would prefer the Authors Addresses being a
>> separate section rather than part of the Appendix cause that is how I
>> have seen it in most RFCs including All the ForCES RFCs.
>
> the problem with what is currently possible is that it came before the
> references when the regular authors section came after.
>
> [HK] This can be easily fixed in the final text, I think
>
> i would probably have to hack at xml2rfc to make it work.  but i still
> think it is against the rules proper - even if you got away with it on
> the requirements.
>
> [HK] I don't think we got away with anything in the Requirements, I 
> wish
> we had :-)
> If you look at any of the ForCES RFCs (below) that we have so far, the
> Authors Addresses are listed as a separate section, not as part of
> Appendix. That's my only requirement, I would like to see this as some
> section, not in the Appendix. And I agree that this section should be
> after the references.
>
>
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3746.txt, 
> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3549.txt
>
>
> Thanks
> Hormuzd
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Forces-protocol mailing list
> Forces-protocol@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
>


_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol