[Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
avri@psg.com Tue, 26 October 2004 17:12 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA24533 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:12:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMV5Q-00085Y-71 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:26:21 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMUey-00085J-N0; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:59:00 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CMUZv-00074m-2Y for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:53:47 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA22181 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:53:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: avri@psg.com
Received: from tla.crepundia.net ([194.71.127.149] helo=report.tla-group.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMUnc-0007LB-9F for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 13:07:56 -0400
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (report.tla-group.com [194.71.127.149]) by report.tla-group.com (8.12.4/8.12.4) with ESMTP id i9QGSpep004539; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 18:28:52 +0200
In-Reply-To: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579239@orsmsx408>
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579239@orsmsx408>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Message-Id: <964204F8-276F-11D9-9DB1-000393CC2112@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:53:39 -0400
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn, forces-protocol@ietf.org, hadi@znyx.com, "Putzolu, David" <david.putzolu@intel.com>, donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn, rha@zurich.ibm.com
Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ?
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
i will stick with it as long as i can, probably can do about an hour. i also think we need to talk about the 'path' issue. i must admit that at the moment, i would be unable to clearly delineate the two, or is it more, positions. is there anyone on this list, preferably not one of the protagonists who tend to speak in their own terms, who can boil down the issue to a few sentences? a. On 26 okt 2004, at 12.27, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote: > Ok, we can start at 8:30 AM. I guess Avri might have to leave early in > this case. Avri, will it be possible for you to attend this meeting on > your mobile from the airport ? > > Pls do let us know if you have any suggestions, > _______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- [Forces-protocol] Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? avri
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this We… Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? ram.gopal
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? avri
- [Forces-protocol] Re: Conference Call this Week ? Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] RE: Conference Call this Week ? Khosravi, Hormuzd M