Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

[Jamal Hadi Salim <[e-mail]>]

On Mon, 2004-10-18 at 11:24, Steven Blake wrote:
[..]
> >      |        +-- T = operation { ADD, DEL, GET, etc}
> >      |        |   |
> >      |        |   +--  // one or more path targets 
> >      |        |        // under discussion
> >      |        |
> >      |        +-- T = operation { ADD, DEL, GET, etc}
> >      |        |   |
> >      |        |   +--  // one or more path targets 
> >      |        |        // under discussion
> >      |        |
> >
> > In other words: Very similar to the way we have it already except
> > the naming has changed and we can target multiple
> > operations and multiple paths in an LFB instance
> 
> If people agree that the protocol should preclude GET operations in
> CONFIG_REQUEST messages, and only allow them in QUERY_REQUEST messages,
> then the latter BNF needs to be edited to remove GET from the operation
> list.  I was assuming that the GET would be encoded as an operation TLV
> in the QUERY_REQUEST message.
> 

Fixed. 

cheers,
jamal



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol