[Forces-protocol] latest update of the model draft

"Deleganes, Ellen M" <ellen.m.deleganes@intel.com> Tue, 18 January 2005 18:12 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16836 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:12:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cqy56-0007Iv-KG for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:27:57 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cqxm7-0006ZM-Az; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:08:19 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CqxMU-0002XH-8u for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:41:50 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA14694 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:41:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fmr17.intel.com ([134.134.136.16] helo=orsfmr002.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cqxbh-0006ck-P1 for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:57:37 -0500
Received: from orsfmr101.jf.intel.com (orsfmr101.jf.intel.com [10.7.209.17]) by orsfmr002.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-outer.mc, v 1.1 2004/09/17 17:50:56 root Exp $) with ESMTP id j0IHfDBx032636 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:41:13 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com [192.168.65.54]) by orsfmr101.jf.intel.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/d: major-inner.mc, v 1.2 2004/09/17 18:05:01 root Exp $) with SMTP id j0IHcT74027724 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:41:13 GMT
Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.60]) by orsmsxvs041.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2005011809411202869 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:41:12 -0800
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([192.168.65.52]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:41:12 -0800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C4FD84.E661D0C5"
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:42:49 -0800
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E03F0E91F@orsmsx408>
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
Thread-Topic: latest update of the model draft
Thread-Index: AcT9hSDYJHBbzBofQKeOEaLwALwOiA==
From: "Deleganes, Ellen M" <ellen.m.deleganes@intel.com>
To: <forces-protocol@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Jan 2005 17:41:12.0413 (UTC) FILETIME=[E6DF70D0:01C4FD84]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 145bb7299e2dee1e594a22594546bac8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:08:17 -0500
Subject: [Forces-protocol] latest update of the model draft
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 3b84c85018a2a63e28f09d46d9796920

This is the latest version of the model draft. The most significant
change was to pull out the class definitions section from this draft and
update the references through the rest of the document. Other minor
editorial changes have also been made.

 

The major open issue is the need to update the FE and LFB attribute XML
based on the discussions that have been going on in the reflector as
these have to reflect the class definitions. There are a number of
editorial comments throughout these sections that need to be resolved as
the major rework is being done. These were captured in an earlier email.

 

Regards,

Ellen

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol