[Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8
"Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Mon, 25 October 2004 06:36 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23658 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:36:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyg4-0006uI-60 for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:50:00 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyQm-0003yZ-Lp; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:34:12 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyOz-0003p5-9B for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:32:21 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23454 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:32:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLycG-0006qJ-5s for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:46:12 -0400
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 99432.341813895; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:51:58 +0800 (CST)
Received: from WWM (unverified [202.96.99.60]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000088495@mail.gsu.cn>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:27:40 +0800
Message-ID: <01ad01c4ba5c$0437f470$845c21d2@Necom.hzic.edu.cn>
From: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, avri@psg.com
References: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579220@orsmsx408>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 14:29:44 +0800
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 21c69d3cfc2dd19218717dbe1d974352
Hi Hormuzd, Avri as well. I think it's not bad to keep a 'Author' section at the first pages, while at the draft end, followed by a 'Author Address' section. I don't think it's necessary to remove the first 'Author' section if it is allowed to be there. What you mean may ask Avri to change the 'Author Address' section to be normal rather than a table of email list, right? Weiming ----- Original Message ----- From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Subject: RE: 01-8 Avri, -----Original Message----- From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com] > > Author Addresses - pls add all our names and address along with yours > and Remove Appendix A. You can get most of it from the Requirements RFC > (I am surprised no one noticed this before, including myself:)) can't add the addresses without the header as far as i know - certainly can't in xml. the only addresses that belong in the address section in the end are the ones in the header and are the ones that need to be contacted during 48 hours. [HK] For the Requirements RFC, we listed all the authors addresses at the end and only the Editors names in the front (header). We actually listed the Editors addresses separately at the end, you can do the same here...no problem with that. Have the rules changed again, in this regard ? Pls correct me if I am wrong... Thanks Hormuzd _______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri
- [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8 avri
- [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8 Wang,Weiming
- [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- [Forces-protocol] Re: 01-8 Wang,Weiming
- [Forces-protocol] 01-9 avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Wang,Weiming
- RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri
- RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri
- RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri
- [Forces-protocol] draft-ietf-forces-protocol-01.t… avri
- [Forces-protocol] Re: draft-ietf-forces-protocol-… Robert Haas
- [Forces-protocol] Meaning of PACKET *SUBSCRIBE op… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Re: draft-ietf-forces-proto… avri
- RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri
- RE: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 Khosravi, Hormuzd M
- Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8 avri