[Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com> Mon, 25 October 2004 06:37 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23787 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:37:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyhY-0006w1-7M for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:51:32 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyTb-00049a-HY; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:37:07 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CLyRY-00041s-Pv for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:35:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA23591 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:34:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmr06.intel.com ([] helo=caduceus.jf.intel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLyew-0006sl-DE for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:48:51 -0400
Received: from petasus.jf.intel.com (petasus.jf.intel.com []) by caduceus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-outer.mc,v 1.15 2004/01/30 18:16:28 root Exp $) with ESMTP id i9P6Y6r8019196; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:34:06 GMT
Received: from orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com []) by petasus.jf.intel.com (8.12.9-20030918-01/8.12.9/d: major-inner.mc,v 1.11 2004/07/29 22:51:53 root Exp $) with SMTP id i9P6c6sE016133; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 06:38:09 GMT
Received: from orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com ([]) by orsmsxvs040.jf.intel.com (SAVSMTP with SMTP id M2004102423342408059 ; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:34:24 -0700
Received: from orsmsx408.amr.corp.intel.com ([]) by orsmsx332.amr.corp.intel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:34:24 -0700
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:34:12 -0700
Message-ID: <468F3FDA28AA87429AD807992E22D07E02579223@orsmsx408>
Thread-Topic: 01-8
Thread-Index: AcS6XEXK22wRECqaSbmPnH7iLWlqxQAABIeQ
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
To: "Wang,Weiming" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, <avri@psg.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Oct 2004 06:34:24.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB6420C0:01C4BA5C]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0a7aa2e6e558383d84476dc338324fab
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ram.gopal@nokia.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, Ligang Dong <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
Subject: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 244a2fd369eaf00ce6820a760a3de2e8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Exactly, you got it right Weiming...thats all I asked for.
I am not sure what gave Avri a different impression...but I can
understand...its 2:30 AM in the morning her time!

Thanks for doing this, Avri!

-----Original Message-----
From: Wang,Weiming [mailto:wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn] 
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2004 11:30 PM
To: Khosravi, Hormuzd M; avri@psg.com
Cc: forces-protocol@ietf.org; Ligang Dong; Robert Haas;
ram.gopal@nokia.com; Jamal Hadi Salim
Subject: Re: 01-8

Hi Hormuzd, Avri as well.

I think it's not bad to keep a 'Author' section at the first pages,
while at the
draft end, followed by a 'Author Address' section. I don't think it's
to remove the first 'Author' section if it is allowed to be there. What
you mean
may ask Avri to change the 'Author Address' section to be normal rather
than a
table of email list, right?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
Subject: RE: 01-8


-----Original Message-----
From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com]
> Author Addresses - pls add all our names and address along with yours
> and Remove Appendix A. You can get most of it from the Requirements
> (I am surprised no one noticed this before, including myself:))

can't add the addresses without the header as far as i know - certainly
can't in xml. the only addresses that belong in the address section in
the end are the ones in the header and are the ones that need to be
contacted during 48 hours.

[HK] For the Requirements RFC, we listed all the authors addresses at
the end and only the Editors names in the front (header). We actually
listed the Editors addresses separately at the end, you can do the same
here...no problem with that. Have the rules changed again, in this
regard ? Pls correct me if I am wrong...


Forces-protocol mailing list