Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: GET/SET in one msg ?

[Jamal Hadi Salim <[e-mail]>]

Hi Ligang,

On Mon, 2004-10-25 at 05:08, Ligang Dong wrote:
> hi, Jamal, 
> Sorry for the delay because of my holiday.
> I like your example although I have not used ASIC in my implementation prototype.
> My current experiences tell me that multicast addressing can make the message simpler and have better transmission efficiency.
> 
> In your design about the multicast, I notice that you use "LFBInstanceMask". It means that you use multicast address. It is obviously an approach. Another approach is to use a list of included LFB instance addresses.

I realized after i responded to you that the approach you posted is
slightly different, but end goals the same. So far i think there are
three approaches being talked about.
1) Yours
2) Steve/Robert with MIID (whcih unfortunately made it into the draft
before consensus was reached)
3) What i posted 

Maybe someone needs to present at the meeting.

Clearly this issue needs revisiting and we may have to make mods
to the LFBSelect TLV.

cheers,
jamal



_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol