Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8

Hi Avri,

I know xml2rfc does not support direct author address listing. I suggest you may
just use a normal section to currently add it. Later when you have much time,
you can add the xml2rfc style address listing. does it help?

weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: <avri@psg.com>
To: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>
Cc: <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; "Jamal Hadi Salim" <hadi@znyx.com>; "Ligang
Dong" <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>; <ram.gopal@nokia.com>; "Robert Haas"
<rha@zurich.ibm.com>; "Weiming Wang" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2004 2:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] RE: 01-8

>
> On 25 okt 2004, at 02.23, Khosravi, Hormuzd M wrote:
>
> > Avri,
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: avri@psg.com [mailto:avri@psg.com]
> >>
> >> Author Addresses - pls add all our names and address along with yours
> >> and Remove Appendix A. You can get most of it from the Requirements
> > RFC
> >> (I am surprised no one noticed this before, including myself:))
> >
> > can't add the addresses without the header as far as i know - certainly
> > can't in xml. the only addresses that belong in the address section in
> > the end are the ones in the header and are the ones that need to be
> > contacted during 48 hours.
> >
> > [HK] For the Requirements RFC, we listed all the authors addresses at
> > the end and only the Editors names in the front (header). We actually
> > listed the Editors addresses separately at the end, you can do the same
> > here...no problem with that. Have the rules changed again, in this
> > regard ? Pls correct me if I am wrong...
> >
>
> i am totally at a loss to know how to satisfy you all on this address
> thing.
>
> xml certainly does not support listing as authors in the back and not
> in the front.  i am sure there is someway around it, but the point is
> the authors addresses in the back are supposed to correspond to the
> addresses in the header.  i expect you did not use xml in the
> requirements.
>
> i can't believe you started this all at the last minute.  it is now
> 2:30 in the morning and instead of doing a read through i am ditzing
> around with addresses.
>
> i expect i will try to submit with the entire list. see what happens.
> it will probably get through the id editor - just won't get through rfc
> editor without special petitions and good reasons.
>
>
>
> a.
>

_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol