Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options for LFB-level multicast]
"Weiming Wang" <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn> Sat, 06 November 2004 13:43 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA07678 for <forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:43:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQQrK-00071d-7j for forces-protocol-web-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:44:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQQqN-0002gO-Lt; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:43:06 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1CQQlk-0001xQ-Ov for forces-protocol@megatron.ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:38:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA07258 for <forces-protocol@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 08:38:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from [202.96.99.56] (helo=202.96.99.56) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CQQlW-0006sU-Ny for forces-protocol@ietf.org; Sat, 06 Nov 2004 08:38:24 -0500
Received: from [202.96.99.59] by 202.96.99.56 with StormMail ESMTP id 58110.341813895; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:59:11 +0800 (CST)
Received: from wwm1 (unverified [219.82.170.89]) by mail.gsu.cn (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.0.11) with ESMTP id <B0000103054@mail.gsu.cn>; Sat, 6 Nov 2004 21:39:34 +0800
Message-ID: <002a01c4c406$2bdce040$020aa8c0@wwm1>
From: Weiming Wang <wmwang@mail.hzic.edu.cn>
To: Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>, forces-protocol@ietf.org
References: <4189F776.4080306@zurich.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options for LFB-level multicast]
Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2004 21:40:10 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 7da5a831c477fb6ef97f379a05fb683c
Cc: "Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <hormuzd.m.khosravi@intel.com>, "(Ram Gopal )" <ram.gopal@nokia.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>, Dong Ligang <donglg@mail.hzic.edu.cn>, Avri Doria <avri@acm.org>
X-BeenThere: forces-protocol@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: forces-protocol <forces-protocol.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/forces-protocol>
List-Post: <mailto:forces-protocol@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol>, <mailto:forces-protocol-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1310153421=="
Sender: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: forces-protocol-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 3.7 (+++)
X-Scan-Signature: 6ba8aaf827dcb437101951262f69b3de
Hi Robert,
Just one tiny point. I still cannot see the vital difference between the Merged mcast and Split mcast. Do you mean the main difference is the Merged mcast is for LFB class mcast while the Split mcast is for LFB Instance ID mcast only? If possible, I think adding some more to explain (or define) the m1 and i1 may help more or less, especially to indicate if m1 is for LFB class and LFB instance, while il is only for LFB instance IDs.
Cheers,
Weiming
----- Original Message -----
From: Robert Haas
Hi All,
I haven't seen any message on ForCES in the last 2 days, so I smell sth fishy. I post again my presentation here.
Cheers,
-Robert
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options for LFB-level multicast
Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 22:12:20 +0100
From: Robert Haas <rha@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM Research Lab
To: <forces-protocol@ietf.org> <forces-protocol@ietf.org>
All,
Attached is a short presentation for the next IETF that summarizes the
three options for LFB-level multicast:
- merged (among the current proposal in the draft),
- split (among the current proposals in the draft, called VPN, and
Zsolt's proposal),
- xcat (Weiming's proposal).
Also, there is a slide with the issue Jamal raised about unnecessarily
repeating the class ID for commands destined to LFBs of the same class.
Personally, I think the overhead is minimal. Maybe your view is different ?
Please review the slides and let me know if you have comments/suggestions.
Depending on the chosen solution(s), we may have to define a TLV for the
LFB Instance ID, as this can be a normal ID, a virtual ID (MIID), a
list, or a range.
Regards,
--
Robert Haas
IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
Säumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland
phone +41-1-724-8698 fax +41-1-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha
--
Robert Haas
IBM Zurich Research Laboratory
Säumerstrasse 4
CH-8803 Rüschlikon/Switzerland
phone +41-1-724-8698 fax +41-1-724-8578 http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~rha
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Forces-protocol mailing list
Forces-protocol@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
_______________________________________________ Forces-protocol mailing list Forces-protocol@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/forces-protocol
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options… Robert Haas
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the options… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Robert Haas
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theop… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theop… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of theop… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentationoftheopti… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation oftheopt… Jamal Hadi Salim
- [Forces-protocol] protcol slides Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Robert Haas
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Robert Haas
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Weiming Wang
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Fwd: [Forces-protocol] Presentation of the o… Joel M. Halpern
- [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Weiming Wang
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Jamal Hadi Salim
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Wang,Weiming
- Re: [Forces-protocol] Data Encoding Jamal Hadi Salim